PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2008The American Journal of Gastroenterology261 citations

Randomized Trial of Low-Volume PEG Solution Versus Standard PEG + Electrolytes for Bowel Cleansing Before Colonoscopy

View Full Paper
CEChristian EllWFWolfgang FischbachHBHans-Joachim Bronisch

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based gut lavage solutions are safe and effective, but require consumption of large volumes of fluid. We compared a new 2 L solution of PEG plus ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc) with standard 4 L PEG with electrolytes (PEG + E) for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy to determine efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability. METHODS: Consenting adult inpatients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy were randomized to receive either 2 L PEG + Asc or 4 L PEG + E. Preparations were taken as split doses the evening before colonoscopy and the following morning. The PEG + Asc group took 1 L at each administration (i.e., total dose of 2 L). The PEG + E group took 2 L at each administration (i.e., total dose of 4 L). Bowel cleansing success was assessed via videotapes by independent, blinded raters. Statistical noninferiority was predefined as a difference of <15% in the lower limit of the 97.5% confidence interval for treatment difference. Patient views on the preparations were elicited. Adverse events were noted. RESULTS: Successful gut cleansing was achieved in 136 of 153 (88.9%) cases of the PEG + Asc group and 147 of 155 (94.8%) cases of the 4 L PEG + E group (mean difference -5.9 -12.0-infinity). The difference fell within the predefined limit for noninferiority. Clinical and laboratory parameters showed no difference in safety profile. Patient ratings of acceptability and taste were better for the PEG + Asc group than for the PEG + E group (P < 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ascorbic acid and PEG-based bowel preparation reduces the volume patients have to drink without compromising efficacy or safety. The low-volume PEG + Asc preparation was more acceptable to patients, and should, therefore, improve effectiveness in routine practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ell et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1cf0ce566b67b7d58619f2https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1REGULATION OF VITAMIN C TRANSPORT2005 · 372 citations
  2. 2A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: Efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda2000 · 391 citations
  3. 3Polyethylene Glycol versus Sodium Phosphate in Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy: a Randomized Trial2005 · 71 citations