PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2025Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics18 citationsOpen Access

Feasibility of HyperSight CBCT for adaptive radiation therapy: A phantom benchmark study of dose calculation accuracy and delivery verification on the Halcyon

View Full Paper
NNNicholas P. NelsonCOCourtney OareGNGeoff Nelson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The development of on‐board cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) has led to improved target localization and evaluation of patient anatomical change throughout the course of radiation therapy. HyperSight, a newly developed on‐board CBCT platform by Varian, has been shown to improve image quality and HU fidelity relative to conventional CBCT. The purpose of this study is to benchmark the dose calculation accuracy of Varian's HyperSight cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) on the Halcyon platform relative to fan‐beam CT‐based dose calculations and to perform end‐to‐end testing of HyperSight CBCT‐only based treatment planning. Methods A HU to mass density curve was measured for the HyperSight CBCT system and implemented into the Eclipse treatment planning system. Following this, computational dosimetric analysis was performed between dose distributions calculated on CT simulation (CT sim ) and HyperSight CBCT images on two anthropomorphic phantoms for pelvic and head and neck treatment sites. Additionally, an end‐to‐end test was carried out for a head and neck intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan. Results The HU to mass density curves acquired on CT sim and HyperSight CBCT were similar (< 30 HU) for near‐water equivalent materials, but deviated for high‐density materials, with a maximum difference of 150 HU. For dose calculations, excellent agreement between dose calculations performed on CT sim and HyperSight CBCT phantom images was observed, where three‐dimensional gamma pass rates between the two dose distributions were observed to be 90% at 1%/1 mm (5% threshold). For the end‐to‐end test, absolute doses were verified to within 1% of ionization chamber measurements, while Delta4+ and portal dosimetry measurements yielded passing results (gamma pass rate 90%) down to 2%/2 mm criterion. Conclusion In this study, the accuracy of dose calculations performed on HyperSight CBCT was found to be within 1% of CT sim calculations for pelvic and head and neck treatment sites. End‐to‐end results using the RANDO anthropomorphic phantom indicate that HyperSight CBCT images are suitable for radiation treatment planning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nelson et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d1bed750575be8d2f3172https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70245
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of a cone-beam computed tomography system calibrated for accurate radiotherapy dose calculation2024 · 33 citations
  2. 2Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Feasibility study on using CT‐to‐CBCT deformable registration for “dose of the day” calculations2014 · 222 citations
  3. 3Adaptive Radiotherapy: Moving Into the Future2019 · 115 citations
  4. 4Review of cone beam computed tomography based online adaptive radiotherapy: current trend and future direction2023 · 112 citations
  5. 5Online Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy: First Clinical Applications2015 · 302 citations