PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Frontiers in Environmental Science0 citationsOpen Access

Comparing modeled and measured carbon dioxide data at five canadian peatlands revealed highly variable non-growing season fluxes

EHE. Kathryn HettingaFRFereidoun RezanezhadBPBhaleka Persaud

Key Points

  • To evaluate the performance of modeled CO2 measurements compared to in-situ data in northern peatlands, focusing on non-growing season emissions.
  • Analyzed 9 years of remotely sensed SMAP-NEE data (2015–2023) across five peatland sites.
  • Compared SMAP-NEE to year-round eddy covariance NEE measurements for accuracy assessment.
  • Developed a Corrected-SMAP-NEE dataset to estimate seasonal carbon budgets.
  • SMAP-NEE showed a stronger growing season CO2 sink compared to EC-NEE measurements.
  • Non-growing season CO2 emissions were highly variable, ranging from 33% to 256% of growing season uptake.
  • The corrected dataset indicated that NGS emissions significantly reduced annual CO2 sink strength.

Abstract

Peatlands hold up to one-third of the global organic carbon (C) stock and are considered a critical C sink. Climate models project that the rate of warming in northern peatlands will continue throughout the 21st century, with the greatest warming occurring during the non-growing season (NGS), which is poorly represented in current in-situ measurements. As a result, the contribution of NGS fluxes to annual peatland CO 2 budgets remains uncertain. Remotely sensed and modeled data products offer a potential means to estimate year-round fluxes, but their performance in peatland ecosystems has not been fully evaluated. In this study, we used the remotely sensed and modeled Soil Moisture Active Passive Level 4 Global Daily EASE-Grid C NEE (SMAP-NEE) data product to acquire 9 years (2015–2023) of SMAP-NEE data for five peatlands. We compared these values to a subset of year-round eddy covariance NEE (EC-NEE) measurements within this time frame at each of the five peatland sites. The analyses showed that the SMAP-NEE data product reports a stronger growing season (GS) sink and a weaker NGS source than the EC-NEE measurements. Using the relationship between SMAP-NEE and EC-NEE, we produced a Corrected-SMAP-NEE dataset, which provided an estimate of seasonal and annual carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) budgets. Our data analyses of the Corrected-SMAP-NEE dataset showed that NGS CO 2 emissions represented a highly variable proportion (33%–256%) of the GS CO 2 uptake, that reduced the annual CO 2 sink strength proportionally. This work demonstrates the necessity of monitoring during the NGS and highlights the importance of incorporating peatland data into model training to improve CO 2 flux estimates in these environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hettinga et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d212702fbce91306374d2https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1838949
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper