PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders1 citationsOpen Access

Utility, Validity and Acceptability of Survey Depression and Anxiety Screening Tools for Routine Multiple Sclerosis Clinic Administration

RHRuby HamerMAMichelle AllanDSDavid Skvarc

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of depression and anxiety screening tools in individuals with multiple sclerosis.
  • Cross-sectional study with 207 participants with multiple sclerosis conducted in Melbourne, Australia.
  • Participants completed the Patient Reported Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21).
  • Sensitivity, specificity, internal consistency, and patient comfort were evaluated.
  • PHQ-9 and DASS-21 depression subscales showed excellent internal consistency (α=.90–.93) and good diagnostic performance.
  • DASS subscales displayed moderate validity for anxiety, with the stress subscale outperforming the anxiety subscale.
  • Participants rated the screening tools as highly acceptable with a mean comfort score of 7.7 out of 10.

Abstract

AbstractBackground Depression and anxiety are often undetected and untreated in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), despite a high prevalence of these conditions in this population. This study evaluated the clinical utility, diagnostic accuracy, and acceptability of depression and anxiety screeners and their integration into routine MS clinic appointments. Methods Participants with MS (N=207; age M=47.3±12.7 years, 77.3% female) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study conducted at an MS clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Consenting participants completed the Patient Reported Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) via an electronic tablet in the clinic waiting room or online for telehealth appointments, and underwent a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 major depressive disorder and generalised anxiety disorder. Sensitivity, specificity, internal consistency, and patient comfort were assessed. Results The PHQ-9 and DASS-21 depression subscales demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α=.90–.93) and good diagnostic performance. For anxiety, DASS subscales showed moderate validity, with the stress subscale outperforming the anxiety subscale. Participants rated screening as highly acceptable (mean comfort score=7.7/10). Conclusions Among people with MS, self-administered depression and anxiety screening tools are valid and acceptable for routine use at MS clinic appointments. Tablet and online survey administration provide scalable options for integrating mental health assessment into standard care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hamer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d21e502fbce9130637cb9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2026.107280
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Utility, validity, feasibility and acceptability of a clinician-administered depression, two-question screening tool for routine multiple sclerosis clinic administration2026
  2. 2E115 Screening for depression and anxiety disorders in patients with systemic sclerosis: a high burden of unmet need and clinical utility of abbreviated PHQ-2 and GAD-2 questionnaires2026
  3. 3Simplifying Depression & Anxiety Screening for Patients ≥12 at a Family Medicine Clinic2024
  4. 4The value and limitations of self‐administered questionnaires in clinical practice and epidemiological studies2024 · 16 citations
  5. 5Assessment of psycho-emotional disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis2025