PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering0 citations

Ensemble and traditional machine learning models for double pipe heat exchanger with vaned twisted tapes

View Full Paper
VKVasima KhanSSSanjay Kumar SinghRKRuchin Kacker

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the predictive performance of machine learning and ensemble learning techniques for modeling double pipe heat exchanger behavior.
  • Analyzed experimental data from a double pipe heat exchanger with vane-modified twisted tapes.
  • Compared various machine learning models including Linear Regression, support vector regression, k-nearest neighbors, and decision tree with ensemble methods like random forest and gradient boosting.
  • Evaluated model performance using metrics such as R², mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE).
  • Gradient boosting achieved the highest predictive accuracy with R²=0.975, MAE=0.018, RMSE=0.025.
  • Decision tree had competitive accuracy but was prone to overfitting, limiting its generalizability.
  • Regularization techniques failed to significantly enhance results, highlighting the effectiveness of ensemble approaches.

Abstract

This study investigates the predictive performance of traditional machine learning algorithms and ensemble learning techniques for evaluating the thermal–hydraulic behavior of a double pipe heat exchanger fitted with vane-modified twisted tapes. Experimental data comprising Reynolds number, Nusselt number, friction factor, and performance evaluation criterion were analyzed using exploratory visualization methods to establish baseline trends and parameter interdependencies. Subsequently, models including Linear Regression, support vector regression, k-nearest neighbors, and decision tree were compared with ensemble approaches such as random forest, gradient boosting, AdaBoost, and XGBoost. Performance was evaluated using R 2 , mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) metrics. Results revealed that gradient boosting achieved the highest predictive accuracy (R 2 = 0.975, MAE = 0.018, RMSE = 0.025), outperforming both traditional models and other ensembles, gradient boosting excelled in predicting performance evaluation criterion. Although the decision tree showed competitive accuracy, its tendency to overfit limited generalization. Regularization techniques did not significantly improve results, underscoring the importance of ensemble-based approaches in capturing nonlinear interactions. The novelty lies in applying ensemble learning to model the complex nonlinear interdependencies in vane-angled twisted tape inserts, achieving superior predictive accuracy over traditional machine learning and offering insights for efficient double pipe heat exchanger optimization. Overall, the study demonstrates that ensemble learning methods, particularly Gradient Boosting, provide robust and reliable predictive frameworks for modeling double pipe heat exchanger performance, offering valuable insights for optimizing heat exchanger design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d21e502fbce9130637d5dhttps://doi.org/10.1177/09544089261454393
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper