PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 20260 citations

Effect of storage conditions on the physicochemical properties, polyphenolic content, and biological activities of fig leaves (

View Full Paper
YTYulian TUMBARSKİTYTeodora YanevaAPAlbena Parzhanova

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate how different storage conditions affect the physicochemical properties and biological activities of fig leaves.
  • Fig leaves were processed and stored using air-drying and freezing methods.
  • Physicochemical properties, polyphenolic content, and biological activities were compared between dried and frozen leaves.
  • Assays conducted included antioxidant activity (DPPH and FRAP) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
  • Dried leaves showed significantly higher protein (17.06%) and carbohydrate (11.4%) content compared to frozen leaves (4.14% and 5.93%).
  • Total polyphenols and flavonoids were greater in dried leaves (24.53 mg GAE/g dw and 0.83 mg QE/g dw) versus frozen leaves (1.80 mg GAE/g dw and 0.07 mg QE/g dw).
  • Dried leaves exhibited stronger antioxidant activity (DPPH: 183.81 vs. 8.38; FRAP: 193.60 vs. 13.81 mM TE/g dw) and higher antimicrobial activity against multiple bacterial strains.

Abstract

Fig tree leaves (Ficus carica L.) are a rich source of biologically active compounds and possess both nutritional value and therapeutic potential. This study compared the physicochemical properties, polyphenolic content, and biological activities of fig leaves processed and stored under different conditions: air-drying and freezing. Dried leaves (DL) exhibited higher protein (17.06 %) and carbohydrate (11.4 %), contents than the frozen leaves (FL) - 4.14 % and 5.93 %. DL extract exhibited higher contents of total polyphenols and flavonoids (24.53 mg GAE/g dw and 0.83 mg QE/g dw) than FL extract (1.80 mg GAE/g dw and 0.07 mg QE/g dw). DL showed greater antioxidant activity (DPPH: 183.81 vs. 8.38; FRAP: 193.60 vs. 13.81 mM TE/g dw). Antimicrobial tests revealed higher inhibitory activity (inhibition zones ≥ 12 mm) of DL extract against Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis, Micrococcus luteus, Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while FL extract was less active. Both dried and frozen fig leaves exhibited notable biological activities, with DL showing superior antioxidant and antimicrobial potential. Consequently, drying was the more suitable storage method, better preserving the bioactivity of fig leaves and enhancing their functional and therapeutic potential.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

TUMBARSKİ et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d221f02fbce9130637e02https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202623601021/pdf
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper