PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics0 citations

Influence of the Neglect of Non-Lambertian Earth Surface Reflectance on the Error in Its Retrieval from Satellite Data

View Full Paper
МТМ.В. ТарасенковВБВ.В. БЕЛОВАША.В. ШЕСТЕРИКОВА

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effect of non-Lambertian surface reflectance on the accuracy of satellite data retrieval.
  • Calculated errors in reflectance for various meteorological visibility ranges and solar zenith angles.
  • Analyzed the contribution of non-Lambertian reflection to the adjacency effect and additional illumination.
  • Assessed impact with specific thresholds for visibility and geometry of observation.
  • At SM ≤ 6 km, errors from neglecting non-Lambertian reflection reach 20.3%, 12%, and 1.4% in reflectance.
  • For SM ≥ 6 km, maximal errors observed are 92%, 14%, and 1.2% respectively.
  • For θsun and θd ≤ 60°, errors are limited to 30%, 7.5%, and 1% across conditions.

Abstract

Acquisition of high-quality satellite information is important for solving a wide range of problems in monitoring the Earth surface, such as estimation of forest health, agricultural productivity, and others. To perform accurate atmospheric correction (elimination of the distorting influence of the atmosphere) of satellite images of the Earth surface, it is crucial to consider various factors that influence received signals, including non-Lambertian surface reflectance (the difference between surface reflection and Lambert’s law according to which radiation is equally reflected in all directions and depends only on the irradiance of the surface and the reflectance). In some algorithms, non-Lambertian reflection is taken into account after solving a problem in the Lambertian reflection approximation. In this case, the assumption is used that the adjacency effect (i.e., the effect of received radiation reflected from surface areas adjacent to the observed one and scattered in the atmosphere) is formed only by Lambertian surfaces. Our calculations show that at meteorological range of visibility SM ≤ 6 km, neglect of contribution of non-Lambertian reflection produces an error in the reflectance of no higher than 20.3%; neglect of non-Lambertian reflection into the adjacency effect and additional illumination results in an error of no more than 12%; and neglect of non-Lambertian reflection in additional illumination, of no more than 1.4%. For a more transparent atmosphere (SM ≥ 6 km), the maximal errors for similar models do not exceed 92, 14, and 1.2%, respectively. For the solar zenith angles θsun ≤ 60° and the angles of the optical axis of a receiving system θd ≤ 60°, the errors do not exceed 30, 7.5, and 1%, respectively. The results prove the possibility of considering non-Lambertian reflection after taking into account the adjacency effect and additional illumination of the Earth surface in the Lambertian reflection approximation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Тарасенков et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d224302fbce9130637f9dhttps://doi.org/10.1134/s1024856025701155
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Statistical modeling of the intensity of light fluxes reflected by the Earth’s spherical surface2010 · 13 citations
  2. 2Modeling of atmospheric effects on the angular distribution of a backscattering peak1988 · 17 citations
  3. 3Advancing retrievals of surface reflectance and vegetation indices over forest ecosystems by combining imaging spectroscopy, digital object models, and 3D canopy modelling2017 · 25 citations
  4. 4Correction of MODIS surface reflectance time series for BRDF effects2012 · 123 citations
  5. 5Techniques for BRDF Correction of Hyperspectral Mosaics2010 · 46 citations