PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Organization Studies0 citations

The Dark Side of Empathy and Organization Studies

View Full Paper
EMElisabeth Naima MikkelsenJGJoana GeraldiSCStewart Clegg

Key Points

  • The aim is to critically examine empathy's negative influences within organizational contexts and its implications for leadership and social interactions.
  • Utilized interdisciplinary approaches from psychology, feminist theory, political science, and anthropology.
  • Identified four negative aspects of empathy: somatic empathy, empathy tax, preferential empathy, and tactical empathy.
  • Highlighted the embodied costs associated with somatic empathy.
  • Identified emotional labor as disproportionately impacting women due to the empathy tax.
  • Uncovered that tactical empathy can be employed manipulatively, leading to deceptive practices in relational contexts.

Abstract

Empathy is widely celebrated as a leadership skill and moral virtue. We agree that empathy is central to social connection, but argue that it is not inherently virtuous. To understand its impacts on organizations, we must move beyond individual-centric views of empathy and instead see it as a relational phenomenon embedded in power relations. Drawing on psychology, feminist theory, political science, and anthropology, we identify four often repressed dark sides of empathy. Distress from somatic empathy exposes the embodied costs of engaging with others’ suffering. Disparity persists through the empathy tax, as the burden of emotional labour falls disproportionately on women. Division persists through preferential empathy, privileging those we identify with while excluding others. Deception arises from tactical empathy, using emotional insight manipulatively. Together, these dark sides expose empathy as an organizing force marked by uneven distributions, contested purposes, and ambivalent consequences. We bring attention to these fundamental tensions in empathy, yet resist campaigns to discredit it. Instead, we propose relational empathy as a way of understanding its complex, power-laden nature.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mikkelsen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d224302fbce9130638039https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406261459079
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Toward a theory of schizophrenia2007 · 2,742 citations
  2. 2Embodied Shame and Organization Studies2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3Relationality in Organizational Research: Exploring The Space Between2000 · 397 citations
  4. 4The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?1999 · 3,488 citations
  5. 5Paving the road to preferential treatment with good intentions: Empathy, accountability and fairness2013 · 46 citations