PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026World Journal of Surgical Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Modeling distress in cancer patients using a fuzzy logic approach based on expert consensus

APAnushk PandeyBTBejoy C. ThomasMPManoj Pandey

Key Points

  • This work aims to develop and validate a fuzzy logic model that explains distress dynamics in cancer patients.
  • Conducted a two-round Delphi process with 23 psychosocial oncology experts to identify 18 distress-related variables.
  • Developed a Mamdani fuzzy inference system using the skfuzzy Python library to model interactions between variables.
  • Validated the model through network analysis, time-series simulations, and sensitivity analyses, comparing it to a traditional system dynamics model.
  • Identified a self-reinforcing 'vicious cycle' of distress influenced by Negative Psychological Factors (weight = 2.00) and Symptoms (weight = 1.50).
  • Demonstrated that positive psychological interventions could lower distress levels by up to 25%.
  • Showed that the fuzzy model produces smoother and more realistic distress trajectories compared to the crisp model.

Abstract

Abstract Objective To develop and validate a fuzzy logic model based on expert consensus to elucidate distress dynamics in cancer patients, examining the non-linear interactions between psychological, social, and medical factors. Methods A two-round Delphi process with 23 psychosocial oncology experts was conducted to generate an interaction matrix of 18 distress-related variables. Using the skfuzzy Python library, a Mamdani fuzzy inference system was constructed, focusing on Negative Psychological Factors, Symptoms, and Positive Psychological Factors as primary drivers. Model validation included network analysis, time-series simulations, and sensitivity analyses, compared against a traditional crisp system dynamics model. Results The fuzzy model confirmed a self-reinforcing “vicious cycle” of distress driven by Negative Psychological Factors (weight = 2.00) and Symptoms (weight = 1.50). Simulations demonstrated that positive psychological interventions could reduce overall distress levels by up to 25%. Network analysis identified distress as a central system hub, while the fuzzy model produced smoother, more clinically realistic trajectories than the crisp model. Conclusion This study provides a robust mathematical explanation for the success of the validated DIC-2 clinical tool. The results underscore the necessity of early, multidisciplinary interventions to disrupt distress cycles, supporting the clinical shift toward treating distress as the “sixth vital sign”.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pandey et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d224302fbce9130638066https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04431-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site2001 · 2,476 citations
  2. 2Psychological Health in Cancer Survivors2008 · 204 citations
  3. 3Factors influencing distress in Indian cancer patients2005 · 23 citations
  4. 4Fuzzy logic: Theory and medical applications1996 · 21 citations
  5. 5A New Quality Standard: The Integration of Psychosocial Care Into Routine Cancer Care2012 · 179 citations