PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

VR. A Formal System: A Minimalist Axiomatization of Arithmetic Grounded in the Spencer-Brown Mark

View Full Paper
VRVitaly Reznik

Key Points

  • This work aims to present a formal axiomatic system for arithmetic that is grounded in the Spencer-Brown mark.
  • Introduced three primitives and four axioms to construct the von Neumann natural numbers.
  • Defined equality and distinctness through Leibniz's principle without including them as primitives.
  • Showed arithmetic equivalence between VR and Peano arithmetic, establishing its consistency relative to ZF set theory.
  • Demonstrated that the formal system VR is arithmetically equivalent to Peano arithmetic.
  • Established that VR's consistency follows relative to ZF set theory.
  • Presented methodological clarifications through formalization in Lean 4 without altering established axioms or theorems.

Abstract

We present a formal axiomatic system VR with three primitives ∅, →, t and four axioms. The von Neumann natural numbers are constructed as the unfolding of the succession operator t from the initial mark ∅ (the first distinction). Equality and distinctness are defined via Leibniz's principle and are not among the primitives. We show that VR is arithmetically equivalent to Peano arithmetic (PA), from which the consistency of VR relative to ZF set theory follows. Keywords: axiomatic arithmetic, foundations of mathematics, Leibnizian equality, von Neumann ordinals, Peano arithmetic, consistency. Version 1. 0. 2 (2026) reframes the ontology of the empty set — from the Leibnizian void to Spencer-Brown's mark (the first distinction: ∅ = as a boundary drawn around nothing, an operational act). The base constructor is renamed void → mark in the companion Lean 4 formalisation. No axiom, definition, or theorem is altered. Version 1. 0. 1 (2026) adds three editorial notes reflecting the Lean 4 formalisation of Part I, published as a separate companion work (Reznik, 2026; Zenodo DOI 10. 5281/zenodo. 20324240). The notes do not alter any axiom, definition, or theorem; they record points of methodological clarification that became visible only through formalisation. See the closing Part IV.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vitaly Reznik (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d226d02fbce91306381f2https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20465139
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper