PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Annals of Hematology0 citationsOpen Access

Genomic and clinical determinants of outcome in Irish AML: a real-world analysis (2007–2025), single centre experience

EEEzzat ElHassadiEOEllen O’RourkeABAhmed Bannaga

Key Points

  • This research aims to characterize genomic and clinical determinants influencing outcomes in Irish AML patients.
  • Retrospective analysis of 166 adult AML patients diagnosed at a single cancer center from 2007 to 2025.
  • Utilization of integrated cytogenetic and molecular profiling to assess prognosis.
  • Survival analyses performed using statistical methods, including log-rank test.
  • Median overall survival (OS) was 19 months, while progression-free survival (PFS) was 11 months.
  • Intensive therapy resulted in a median OS of 32 months compared to 9 months for less-intensive treatment (HR 0.35, P < 0.0001).
  • TP53 mutations were linked to inferior OS (median 12 vs 23 months; P = 0.008).

Abstract

Abstract Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a genetically heterogeneous malignancy in which cytogenetic and molecular features critically inform diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making. While traditional karyotyping has long guided risk stratification, high-throughput sequencing has revealed extensive molecular diversity, particularly within cytogenetically normal AML, reshaping AML classification and management. This study characterises the genomic landscape and clinical outcomes of an Irish AML cohort using integrated cytogenetic and molecular profiling. We retrospectively analysed 166 adult AML patients diagnosed at our cancer centre between 2007 and 2025. Demographic, clinical, cytogenetic, molecular, and treatment data were collected. Karyotype-based and ELN 2022/2024 molecular classifications were applied. Survival analyses were performed using Prism v10.06, with statistical significance assessed using the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. Mutation frequencies were compared with published literature, and genomic subgroups were examined for prognostic impact. The median age at diagnosis was 70 years (range 24–92), with 68% de novo AML, 19% secondary AML, 10% therapy-related AML, and 3% APL. Of 126 treated patients, 72 received intensive therapy and 53 received less-intensive regimens. CR rates were 75% in the intensive cohort versus 36% in the less-intensive cohort. Karyotyping (available in 87%) revealed 47% with normal cytogenetics, favourable risk in 5% and 30% with adverse-risk features. Molecular profiling identified ELN 2022 adverse-, intermediate-, and favourable-risk categories in 42%, 47%, and 7% of intensively treated patients; in the less-intensive cohort, adverse risk predominated (87%). TP53 mutations occurred in 8% of the entire cohort. Median OS and PFS were 19 and 11 months, respectively. Younger age (<65 years), favourable / intermediate cytogenetics, de novo AML, favourable / intermediate-risk ELN 2022 classification, and TP53 wild-type status were associated with significantly superior survival (all P < 0.05). Intensive therapy conferred marked survival benefit (median OS 32 vs 9 months; HR 0.35, P < 0.0001). ELN 2024 risk groups did not discriminate survival in the less-intensive cohort. TP53 mutations were associated with significantly inferior OS (median 12 vs 23 months; P = 0.008). This single-centre study demonstrates a heterogeneous genomic landscape in Irish AML patients, with mutation frequencies broadly consistent with international datasets but with notable enrichment of adverse-risk disease in older and less-intensively treated populations. Integrated cytogenetic and molecular profiling strongly predicted outcomes, while age, treatment intensity, and TP53 status emerged as dominant prognostic factors. These findings highlight the critical value of comprehensive genomic assessment to guide stratified AML management within the Irish population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

ElHassadi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d228d02fbce913063851ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-026-07081-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Retrospective study on the clinical outcomes and characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia: different outcomes in the same risk group2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Performance of the ELN 2022 risk stratification in a real-world Canadian AML patient population2025
  3. 3Prognostic evaluation of ELN-2022 and ELN-2024 risk stratification in newly diagnosed AML patients and development of a novel genetic risk model2025
  4. 4TP53, EZH2, or RUNX1 mutations predict poor outcomes in ELN 2022 adverse risk group of adult AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT2025
  5. 5Risk stratification of newly diagnosed AML receiving nonintensive treatment2025