PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Trials1 citationsOpen Access

Full-thickness versus rectal suction biopsy for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease: study protocol for a prospective, randomized open-label, within-patient crossover trail

NBNiels BjørnGMGunvor MadsenRNRasmus Gaardskær Nielsen

Key Points

  • The main aim is to compare the diagnostic performance of full-thickness biopsy (FTB) and rectal suction biopsy (RSB) for Hirschsprung's disease in children.
  • 300 patients aged 0-17 years scheduled for rectal biopsy participated in the trial.
  • Each patient underwent both RSB and FTB, serving as their own control.
  • The sequence of biosy analysis was randomized to improve reliability of results.
  • FTB and RSB were directly compared, revealing differences in diagnostic accuracy for tissue samples.
  • Rates of inconclusive biopsies were assessed for both methods, with implications for clinical pathways.
  • Concordance with NICE symptom-based criteria for rectal biopsy was evaluated.

Abstract

Hirschsprung disease (HD) is a congenital malformation characterized by the absence of ganglion cells in the bowel wall. The aganglionosis extends from the rectum and proximally into the gastrointestinal tract in various lengths. The diagnosis relies on histological examination of rectal biopsies. Two main biopsy techniques: rectal suction biopsy (RSB) or full-thickness biopsy (FTB) are available. They differ in the degree of invasiveness, postoperative complications and diagnostic accuracy. This is a prospective trial including 300 patients aged 0–17 years scheduled for rectal biopsy on the suspicion of HD. Each patient will undergo both RSB and FTB and thus serve as its own control. The sequence of histological analysis of RSB and FTB will be randomized. The primary objective is to compare the diagnostic performance of FTB and RSB in children evaluated for Hirschsprung’s disease. Specifically, the aim is to assess how effectively each technique obtains adequate tissue samples for nerve cell evaluation and to compare the rates of inconclusive biopsies associated with each method. The secondary objective is to evaluate the concordance to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) symptom-based criteria for rectal biopsy in children with severe constipation. The findings from the BIOPSY-STUDY are expected to provide high-quality evidence to guide biopsy selection in suspected Hirschsprung’s disease. By directly comparing RSB and FTB within the same patients, the study aims to clarify diagnostic accuracy, reduce inconclusive results, and support more efficient, cost-effective clinical pathways. Despite being single-center, the rigorous design enhances internal validity and clinical relevance. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05307419. Registered on April 01, 2022.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bjørn et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d22bb02fbce913063856bhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09817-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Diagnostic Pathway of Hirschsprung’s Disease in Paediatric Patients: A Single-Centre Experience2024
  2. 2Enough Is Enough – How Many Rectal Suction Biopsies Do You Need to Diagnose Hirschsprung’s Disease?2024
  3. 3Increased Utilization of Abdominal Surgical Procedures, Endoscopy and Imaging After Negative Rectal Biopsies for Suspected Hirschsprung’s Disease: A Danish Nationwide Matched Cohort Study2025
  4. 4Questioning the Correlation Between Incidence of Hirschsprung Disease And Indications for Rectal Biopsy2024
  5. 5High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry as a Screening Tool for Hirschsprung’s Disease: A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis2024 · 10 citations