PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Progress in Disaster Science0 citationsOpen Access

Structure, time and effectiveness: An integrative review for resilient interorganizational networks in post-disaster recovery

View Full Paper
LDL. DamaschinFGF. GiardiniRWR. Wittek

Key Points

  • This review examines the characteristics of interorganizational networks during post-disaster recovery, focusing on governance and effectiveness.
  • Conducted a keyword search in Scopus, EBSCOhost, and Web of Science
  • Included 17 studies after screening based on predefined criteria
  • Used an inductive–deductive coding scheme for thematic analysis
  • Post-disaster recovery networks exhibit asymmetries in resources and legitimacy affecting decision-making.
  • Decentralization in recovery networks may lead to coordination challenges and fragmentation risks.
  • Different governance forms yield varying effectiveness outcomes depending on network composition and recovery goals.

Abstract

This paper examines the characteristics of interorganizational networks in post-disaster recovery, focusing on network governance, evolution and effectiveness. By bringing together the collaborative resilience framework and the theory of interorganizational network governance, this study provides novel insights: network governance explains how structural conditions and coordination arrangements shape effectiveness, while collaborative resilience captures the adaptive mechanisms that allow networks to sustain collaboration over long-term recovery. A keyword search was conducted in major databases including Scopus, EBSCOhost and Web of Science. After screening titles, abstracts and full texts based on predefined criteria, 17 studies were included. An inductive–deductive coding scheme informed the thematic analysis, identifying three main patterns. First, post-disaster recovery networks are characterized by asymmetries in resources and legitimacy, which shape coordination and decision-making processes. Second, recovery networks show a pattern of decentralization which can lead to coordination challenges and risk of network fragmentation. Third, different governance forms are associated with different effectiveness outcomes, depending on the composition of the network and the network's goal in recovery. Overall, the review shows that post-disaster recovery is shaped by a tension between governance structures and the relational conditions required for collaborative resilience, as no single governance form simultaneously satisfies all the characteristics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Damaschin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d22bb02fbce9130638753https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100607
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multi-stakeholder collaboration in community post-disaster reconstruction: case study from the Longmen Shan Fault area in China2017 · 35 citations
  2. 2Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public‐Sector Organizational Networks2001 · 1,496 citations
  3. 3Mitigating interorganizational conflicts in humanitarian logistics collaboration: the roles of contractual agreements, trust and post-disaster environmental uncertainty phases2021 · 28 citations
  4. 4Organizational Networks and Recovery following the Canterbury Earthquakes2014 · 46 citations
  5. 5ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS2005 · 5,686 citations