PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Framing Generative Artificial Intelligence through metaphors: Insights from Italian university students

View Full Paper
NSNadia SansoneAIAlessandro IannellaIBIlaria Bortolotti

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how Italian university students represent Generative Artificial Intelligence through metaphors and explore any associations with demographic factors.
  • Cross-sectional online survey of 296 Italian university students
  • Data analysis using a hybrid Framework Method with category development and coding assessments
  • Bivariate analysis employing chi-square tests and false discovery rate control
  • Predominant metaphors identified include tool/assistant (high frequency), partner/coach, and agent/autonomy framings.
  • Less common, yet significant, metaphor families focus on risk/control and ethics/governance.
  • Findings suggest metaphors reflect students' understanding and expectations towards GAI, contributing to AI literacy development.

Abstract

This study investigates how Italian university students metaphorically represent Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and whether such representations show potential associations with gender, age, field of study and prior GAI knowledge. Data were collected through a cross-sectional online survey of 296 students. The analysis followed a hybrid Framework Method, combining inductive development of a category system, deductive application with single-label assignment, and double coding with assessment of intercoder reliability. Bivariate patterns were examined using chi-square tests and evaluated under Benjamini–Hochberg procedure for false discovery rate control (q = 0.05). Results revealed a compact repertoire of metaphor families. Tool/assistant framings predominated, followed by partner/coach and agent/autonomy framings; risk/control and ethics/governance framings were less frequent yet salient. Students’ metaphors highlight available representational resources and pragmatic expectations about GAI, offering insights for Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy activities focused on understanding, agency, and control. Limitations include explicit elicitation, single-label coding, and the use of a convenience sample. Future research should test multi-label coding schemes and analyse conversational interaction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sansone et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d236002fbce9130639091https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1459
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Metaphorical conceptualizations of generative artificial intelligence use by Chinese university EFL learners2024 · 17 citations
  2. 2Beyond the hype: unpacking Italian university students’ engagement with generative AI for learning and academic integrity2026
  3. 3Metaphorical perceptions of secondary school students regarding the concept of generative artificial intelligence2026 · 2 citations
  4. 4Generative AI in English Sixth Form Education: Student Use, Perceptions, and Literacy Gaps2025
  5. 5Social representations of GenAI and paradoxical tensions in its adoption in higher education2026