PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 12, 2015Annals of Surgery75 citationsOpen Access

Impact of Risk Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Risk-adjusted Surgical Readmission Rates

LGLaurent G. GlanceAKArthur L. KellermannTOTurner Osler

Structured PICO

Does adjusting for socioeconomic status affect the comparison of 30-day surgical readmission rates between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals?

P
Population
Patients undergoing major surgery at safety-net hospitals (SNH) and non-SNHs
I
Intervention
Hospital profiling with adjustment for socioeconomic status (SES)
C
Comparator
Hospital profiling without SES adjustment
O
Outcome
30-day readmission after major surgeryhard clinical

Adjusting for socioeconomic status eliminates the apparent difference in surgical readmission rates between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals, suggesting differences are driven by patient case mix rather than hospital quality.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether differences in readmission rates between safety-net hospitals (SNH) and non-SNHs are due to differences in hospital quality, and to compare the results of hospital profiling with and without SES adjustment. BACKGROUND: In response to concerns that quality measures unfairly penalizes SNH, NQF recently recommended that performance measures adjust for socioeconomic status (SES) when SES is a risk factor for poor patient outcomes. METHODS: Multivariate regression was used to examine the association between SNH status and 30-day readmission after major surgery. The results of hospital profiling with and without SES adjustment were compared using the CMS Hospital Compare and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) methodologies. RESULTS: Adjusting for patient risk and SES, patients admitted to SNHs were not more likely to be readmitted compared with patients in in non-SNHs (AOR 1.08; 95% CI:0.95-1.23; P = 0.23). The results of hospital profiling based on Hospital Compare were nearly identical with and without SES adjustment (ICC 0.99, κ 0.96). Using the HRRP threshold approach, 61% of SNHs were assigned to the penalty group versus 50% of non-SNHs. After adjusting for SES, 51% of SNHs were assigned to the penalty group. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in surgery readmissions between SNHs and non-SNHs are due to differences in the patient case mix of low-SES patients, and not due to differences in quality. Adjusting readmission measures for SES leads to changes in hospital ranking using the HRRP threshold approach, but not using the CMS Hospital Compare methodology. CMS should consider either adjusting for the effects of SES when calculating readmission thresholds for HRRP, or replace it with the approach used in Hospital Compare.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Glance et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d2a181e7099f69104fdfehttps://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001363
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper