PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1999The Journal of General Physiology278 citationsOpen Access

Local Control Models of Cardiac Excitation–Contraction Coupling

MSMichael D. SternLSLong‐Sheng SongHCHeping Cheng

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the mechanisms behind calcium release in cardiac muscle during excitation-contraction coupling.
  • Numerical simulation of RyRs and L-type calcium channels interactions in calcium nano-domains.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Computational models of cardiac excitation-contraction coupling simulating stochastic dynamics of ryanodine receptors (RyRs) and L-type sarcolemmal calcium channels
I
Intervention
Various RyR gating schemes (single-channel measurement-based vs. phenomenological four-state vs. allosteric interactions)
O
Outcome
Stability of excitation-contraction coupling

Allosteric interactions between nearest-neighbor ryanodine receptors may be essential for stable cardiac excitation-contraction coupling, explaining their conserved lattice array structure.

Abstract

In cardiac muscle, release of activator calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum occurs by calcium- induced calcium release through ryanodine receptors (RyRs), which are clustered in a dense, regular, two-dimensional lattice array at the diad junction. We simulated numerically the stochastic dynamics of RyRs and L-type sarcolemmal calcium channels interacting via calcium nano-domains in the junctional cleft. Four putative RyR gating schemes based on single-channel measurements in lipid bilayers all failed to give stable excitation-contraction coupling, due either to insufficiently strong inactivation to terminate locally regenerative calcium-induced calcium release or insufficient cooperativity to discriminate against RyR activation by background calcium. If the ryanodine receptor was represented, instead, by a phenomenological four-state gating scheme, with channel opening resulting from simultaneous binding of two Ca2+ ions, and either calcium-dependent or activation-linked inactivation, the simulations gave a good semiquantitative accounting for the macroscopic features of excitation-contraction coupling. It was possible to restore stability to a model based on a bilayer-derived gating scheme, by introducing allosteric interactions between nearest-neighbor RyRs so as to stabilize the inactivated state and produce cooperativity among calcium binding sites on different RyRs. Such allosteric coupling between RyRs may be a function of the foot process and lattice array, explaining their conservation during evolution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stern et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d352e134eb036ab958089https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.113.3.469
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper