PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1981The Journal of Immunology351 citationsOpen Access

Studies on the capacity of B cells to serve as antigen-presenting cells.

RCRobert W. ChesnutHGH M Grey

Key Points

  • To evaluate whether B cells can bind, process, and present antigens via membrane immunoglobulin receptors to stimulate antigen-specific T cell proliferation similarly to macrophages.
  • Immunized mice with rabbit IgG (NRGG) to elicit an antigen-specific proliferative T cell response.
  • Compared the capacity of macrophages versus macrophage-depleted spleen cells (MDSC) to present NRGG or rabbit anti-mouse Ig (RAMIG, which binds all membrane Ig) to NRGG-primed T cells.
  • Controlled for contaminating macrophages, T cell involvement via anti-Thy 1 plus complement depletion, and evaluated genetic restriction using syngeneic versus allogeneic MDSCs.
  • RAMIG-pulsed MDSCs stimulated T cell proliferation, whereas NRGG-pulsed or ovalbumin-pulsed MDSCs failed to induce a proliferative response.
  • Inactivation of RAMIG-pulsed MDSCs by freeze-thawing or ultraviolet irradiation, as well as testing heat-aggregated NRGG, eliminated proliferation, ruling out presentation by contaminating macrophages.
  • Antigen presentation by RAMIG-pulsed MDSCs was genetically restricted, demonstrating 10- to 30-fold greater [3H]-thymidine incorporation in syngeneic compared to allogeneic presentations.

Abstract

Abstract In this paper we have tested the hypothesis that B cells, via their Ig receptors, can take up, process, and present antigen to T cells in an analogous manner to macrophages. Rabbit IgG (NRGG) was used to immunize mice for an antigen-specific proliferative response. Rabbit anti-mouse Ig (RAMIG), a test antigen that could bind to all B cells via their membrane Ig, and NRGG, an antigen that would bind to only a very few antigen-specific B cells, were compared for their capacity to stimulate a T cell proliferative response when macrophages or B cells, in the form of macrophage-depleted spleen cells (MDSC), were used as the source of antigen-presenting cells. When macrophages were used as antigen-presenting cells, NRGG and RAMIG were indistinguishable in their capacity to stimulate a proliferative response in NRGG-primed T cells. In contrast, when MDSC were used as a source of antigen-presenting B cells, only RAMIG, and not NRGG, stimulated T cell proliferation. That the T cells, also present in the MDSC, were not involved in the antigen presentation was demonstrated by the fact that treatment of MDSC with anti-Thy 1 and complement did not decrease the capacity of RAMIG-pulsed MDSC to stimulate a proliferative response. A variety of experiments were carried out in an attempt to rule out the possibility that contaminating macrophages might have been responsible for these results. The fact that NRGG-pulsed MDSC did not induce proliferation indicated that insufficient macrophages were present in the MDSC to account for the proliferative response by a mechanism involving the direct uptake of antigen by such contaminating cells. The inability of MDSC to present another antigen, ovalbumin, in a similar T cell proliferative response strengthens that conclusion. The possibility that the immune complexes formed between RAMIG and B cell Ig created a “super antigen” that could be taken up very efficiently by a small number of contaminating macrophages was also investigated. The evidence against this possibility was: 1) Heat-aggregated NRGG did not stimulate a proliferative response when MDSC were used as presenting cells. 2) If after being pulsed with RAMIG the MDSC were inactivated by freeze-thawing or ultraviolet irradiation, no proliferative response was induced. Furthermore, the presentation of RAMIG by MDSC was shown to be genetically restricted in that T cells incorporated 10- to 30-fold more 3H-thymidine when presented antigen by syngeneic compared with allogeneic RAMIG-pulsed MDSC. We concluded from these experiments that under the experimental conditions employed, B cells were capable of directly presenting antigen to T ceils in a genetically restricted fashion. If correct, this could represent a mechanism by which antigen-specific T-B interaction takes place.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chesnut et al. (1981) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d57fd750575be8d2f6a6ehttps://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.126.3.1075
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper