PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1975American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content76 citations

Arterial wall mechanics and composition and the effects of smooth muscle activation

View Full Paper
RCR. H. Cox

Structured PICO

P
Population
Isolated cylindrical segments of canine carotid and iliac arteries
I
Intervention
Maximal norepinephrine (NE) and potassium (K) activation, and metabolic inhibition of smooth muscle
C
Comparator
Passive mechanics (following metabolic inhibition) and comparison between carotid and iliac arteries
O
Outcome
Wall tangential stress-strain relations, external diameter, and axial force in response to internal pressure variationssurrogate

The study demonstrates that passive wall elements play an important role in setting the length of contractile elements in arteries, and that higher pressure-diameter responses are determined by the force-generating capacity of smooth muscle.

Abstract

A comparison of passive mechanics and the effects of smooth muscle (SM) activation has been made in canine carotid and iliac arteries. Measurements of external diameter and axial force were made on isolated cylindrical segments in response to internal pressure variations. Data were obtained during maximal norepinephrine (NE) and potassium (K) activation, and following metabolic inhibition of SM. These data were used to determine wall tangential stress-strain relations. The maximum increase in wall stress after K and after NE was greater for the iliacs and occurred at smaller values of wall strain. Passive stress-strain curves for the iliacs were likewise shifted to smaller strains, suggesting an important role of passive wall elements in setting the length of contractile elements. Diameter responses to K at low values of pressure were the same for iliacs and carotids, but were better maintained at higher pressure levels for the iliacs. Similar findings were found for iliac responses to NE and K. The results suggest that at low values of wall stress, active diameter responses are not strongly dependent on the maximum isometric stress development. However, higher pressure-diameter responses are also determined by the force-generating capacity of SM.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

R. H. Cox (1975) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d6de3cc9f7df1b7056bbdhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1975.229.3.807
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper