PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2004Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology15 citations

Inhibitors of the Na+/H+ Exchanger Cannot Prevent Atrial Electrical Remodeling in the Goat

View Full Paper
YBYuri BlaauwNBNorbert BeierPVPepijn van der Voort

Structured PICO

Do NHE1 blockers (EMD87580 and EMD125021) prevent or revert AF-induced electrical remodeling in a goat model of AF?

P
Population
10 chronically instrumented conscious goats with atrial fibrillation maintained by burst pacing
I
Intervention
Intravenous and oral dosages of two NHE1 blockers (EMD87580 and EMD125021), including oral pretreatment with EMD87580 (8 mg/kg bid) starting 3 days before AF
C
Comparator
Placebo
O
Outcome
Atrial electrical remodeling (shortening of atrial refractoriness, duration of AF episodes, cycle length during persistent AF)surrogate

Blockade of the Na+/H+ exchanger does not prevent or revert AF-induced electrical remodeling in a goat model, challenging the hypothesis that NHE1 inhibitors are beneficial for AF.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that blockade of the Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE1) can prevent atrial fibrillation (AF)-induced electrical remodeling and the development of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: AF was maintained by burst pacing in 10 chronically instrumented conscious goats. Intravenous and oral dosages of two NHE1 blockers (EMD87580 and EMD125021) resulted in plasma levels several magnitudes higher than required for effective NHE1 blockade. Shortening of atrial refractoriness immediately after 5 minutes of AF was not prevented by NHE1 blockade. In remodeled atria, increasing dosages of EMD87580 and EMD125021 did not reverse shortening of the atrial refractory period or reduce the duration of AF episodes. The cycle length during persistent AF also was not affected. Oral pretreatment with EMD87580 (8 mg/kg bid) starting 3 days before AF could not prevent electrical remodeling. After 24 and 48 hours of remodeling, the duration of AF paroxysms was 47 +/- 32 seconds and 135 +/- 63 seconds compared to 56 +/- 17 seconds and 136 +/- 52 seconds in placebo-treated animals (P > 0.8), respectively. CONCLUSION: In the goat model of AF, the Na+/H+ exchanger inhibitors EMD87580 and EMD125021 did not prevent or revert AF-induced electrical remodeling. This indicates that activation of the Na+/H+ exchanger is not involved in the intracellular pathways of electrical remodeling. This does not support the suggestion that blockers of the Na+/H+ exchanger may be beneficial for prevention and treatment of AF.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Blaauw et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d82801c2cbcb15c5e6b91https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03498.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper