PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2003Circulation161 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Fibrillation in the Remodeled Atrium

View Full Paper
KSKaori ShinagawaASAkiko Shiroshita-TakeshitaGSGernot Schram

Key Points

  • This research investigates how amiodarone affects atrial remodeling induced by tachycardia, focusing on its unique efficacy against atrial fibrillation.
  • Mongrel dogs experienced atrial tachycardia at 400 bpm for 7 days with or without antiarrhythmic treatment.

Structured PICO

Does amiodarone prevent or reverse electrical remodeling induced by atrial tachycardia in a canine model?

P
Population
Mongrel dogs subjected to atrial tachycardia (400 bpm for 7 days) and unpaced dogs
I
Intervention
Amiodarone, dofetilide, or flecainide begun 3 days before the onset of tachypacing and maintained until a final electrophysiological study; or amiodarone administered after induction of atrial tachycardia remodeling
C
Comparator
Absence of therapy during tachypacing, and unpaced dogs in the absence or presence of treatment
O
Outcome
AF vulnerability (percentage of sites with AF induction by single premature extrastimuli), mean AF duration, atrial effective refractory period (ERP), and conduction velocitysurrogate

Amiodarone uniquely prevents and reverses atrial tachycardia-induced electrical remodeling in a canine model, providing a mechanistic explanation for its superior efficacy in atrial fibrillation.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The basis of the unique effectiveness of amiodarone for atrial fibrillation (AF) is poorly understood. The present study tested the hypothesis that amiodarone blocks electrical remodeling induced by atrial tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Mongrel dogs were subjected to atrial tachycardia (400 bpm for 7 days) in the absence and presence of therapy with amiodarone, the class III cardiac antiarrhythmic drug dofetilide, or the class I agent flecainide begun 3 days before the onset of tachypacing and maintained until a final electrophysiological study. AF vulnerability (percentage of sites with AF induction by single premature extrastimuli), mean AF duration, atrial effective refractory period (ERP), and conduction velocity were compared among these dogs and in unpaced dogs in the absence or presence of treatment with the same agents. Only amiodarone prevented promotion of AF duration and vulnerability by atrial tachycardia. Furthermore, only amiodarone eliminated tachycardia-induced ERP abbreviation and loss of ERP rate adaptation while obviating L-type Ca2+-current alpha1c-subunit downregulation as determined by Western blot. In an additional series of dogs monitored with repeated electrophysiological studies, amiodarone administered after the induction of atrial tachycardia remodeling reversed remodeling within several days, despite continued atrial tachypacing during amiodarone therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone is uniquely effective against AF promotion by atrial tachycardia remodeling in this experimental model and prevents electrophysiological and biochemical consequences of remodeling. Amiodarone also reversed remodeling established by 4 days of atrial tachycardia. The inhibition of atrial tachycardia remodeling may therefore contribute to the superior efficacy of amiodarone in AF.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shinagawa et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d82801c2cbcb15c5e6b97https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000055316.35552.74
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper