PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1994Circulation68 citationsOpen Access

Effects of enalapril versus losartan on regression of volume overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy in rats.

View Full Paper
MRMarcel RuzickaBYBaoxue YuanFLF. H. H. Leenen

Structured PICO

Does enalapril or losartan reverse volume overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy in rats?

P
Population
Rats with volume overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy (induced by aortocaval shunt or minoxidil treatment)
I
Intervention
Enalapril or losartan
C
Comparator
Spontaneous regression (discontinuation of minoxidil treatment) or each other
O
Outcome
Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular mass and LV dilation in relation to changes in central hemodynamicssurrogate

In rat models of volume overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy, RAS blockade with enalapril or losartan reverses LV hypertrophy indirectly by decreasing high filling pressures rather than via direct cardiac trophic effects.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of nonhemodynamic cardiac trophic mechanisms differs not only between different models of cardiac hypertrophy but also within the same model for development versus maintenance of cardiac hypertrophy. Our previous studies pointed to a major role for the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) as a cardiac trophic stimulus in the remodeling of the heart in response to volume overload by aortocaval shunt or minoxidil treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the present study, we evaluated the effects of blockade of the RAS by the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril and the angiotensin II receptor blocker losartan on left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular mass and LV dilation in relation to changes in central hemodynamics during the maintenance of minoxidil and aortocaval shunt-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Both blockers similarly decreased LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and LV peak systolic pressure, whereas cardiac output remained unchanged in both models of volume overload. This suggests a major contribution of improved LV performance and decreased afterload to the decrease in cardiac preload by the two blockers rather than decreased venous return. Both blockers reversed LV hypertrophy in parallel to their effects on LVEDP in both models of volume overload. In minoxidil-treated rats, the extent of reversal in LV mass and dilation by the two blockers was similar to "spontaneous regression" after discontinuation of minoxidil treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that in contrast to the development phase of cardiac hypertrophy, the RAS does not contribute to the maintenance of volume overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy in these two models via direct cardiac trophic effects. The RAS, however, maintains cardiac hypertrophy indirectly by contributing to the persistence of high filling pressures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ruzicka et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d8ddc33e2df9c962fb334https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.90.1.484
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper