PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1980Clinical Cardiology5 citations

Controlled study of intravenous nitroglycerin treatment for two days in patients with recent myocardial infarction

View Full Paper
WBW.‐D. BussmannGBG. BartheHKH Klepzig

Structured PICO

Does intravenous nitroglycerin improve hemodynamic parameters in patients with recent myocardial infarction?

P
Population
46 patients with recent myocardial infarction
I
Intervention
Intravenous nitroglycerin for 48 hours
C
Comparator
No nitroglycerin (untreated control)
O
Outcome
Hemodynamic measurements (diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure, cardiac output, mean arterial pressure, heart rate)surrogate

Intravenous nitroglycerin improves hemodynamics, specifically lowering filling pressures and increasing cardiac output, in patients with recent myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular failure.

Abstract

Hemodynamic measurements were obtained for 48 h in 46 patients with recent myocardial infarction. Patients were randomized to treatment with (n = 22) and without nitroglycerin (NTG) n = 24). In patients with diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure (PAEDP) less than 20 mmHg (group I), NTG decreased PAEDP from 15 to 11 mmHg (n = 13); in the untreated control group PAEDP remained unchanged (n = 15). Cardiac output decreased in the NTG group from 5.4 to 5.0 1/min and in the control group from 4.7 to 4.4 1/min. Mean arterial pressure decreased in both groups, in the NTG group from 106 to 97 mmHg and in the control group from 102 to 94 mmHg. In patients with left ventricular failure and PAEDP greater than 20 mmHg (group II) the decrease in left ventricular filling pressure was significantly greater (25 to 17 mmHg, n = 9) than in the control group (24 to 20 mmHg, n = 9). Cardiac output increased during NTG treatment from 4.2 to 5.1 1/min. In the control group, however, cardiac output decreased from 4.2 to 3.6 1/min. Mean arterial pressure decreased from 103 to 95 mmHg in the NTG group and from 114 to 96 mmHg in the control group. Heart rate did not change significantly. Thus, PAEDP decreased significantly in patients who received NTG treatment for 48 h compared to an untreated control group. Cardiac output increased in treated patients, especially those with left ventricular failure, but decreased in the control group. Mean arterial pressure decreased to the same degree in treated patients and in controls.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bussmann et al. (1980) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d9667cc9f7df1b705aaeahttps://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960030607
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intravenous nitroglycerin in acute myocardial infarction.1975 · 311 citations
  2. 2Protection of Jeopardized Ischemic Myocardium by Reduction of Ventricular Afterload1974 · 207 citations
  3. 3Comparison between the effects of nitroprusside and nitroglycerin on ischemic injury during acute myocardial infarction.1976 · 362 citations
  4. 4Reversal by Phenylephrine of the Beneficial Effects of Intravenous Nitroglycerin in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction1975 · 137 citations
  5. 5The Effects of Nitroglycerin and Amyl Nitrite on Arteriolar and Venous Tone in the Human Forearm1965 · 432 citations