PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1979Heart23 citationsOpen Access

Effect of coronary care on myocardial infarct mortality.

BCB. L. Chapman

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how coronary care units affect the hospital mortality rate for patients with acute myocardial infarction.
  • Patients treated in a coronary care unit (CCU) were compared to those in general wards.

Structured PICO

Does treatment in a coronary care unit reduce hospital mortality rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction compared to general ward care?

P
Population
Patients with acute myocardial infarction treated in hospital
I
Intervention
Treatment in a coronary care unit (CCU)
C
Comparator
Treatment in general wards (either before or after the introduction of coronary care)
O
Outcome
Hospital mortality ratehard clinical

Treatment in a coronary care unit significantly reduces hospital mortality for acute myocardial infarction patients across all levels of infarct severity compared to general ward care.

Abstract

To study the effect of coronary care on the hospital mortality rate of acute myocardial infarction, patients treated in a coronary care unit (CCU) were compared with patients treated in general wards. To assess the comparability of cases, the coronary prognostic index of Chapman and Gray (1973) was modified. The modified index was based on serum aspartic aminotransferase (AST) level and cardiogenic shock. Modification was necessary because oliguria, the third variable on which the original index was based, could not always be determined for general ward cases. This modified index assessed very accurately the prognosis of myocardial infarct patients treated in hospital. Patients treated in the coronary care unit had a significantly higher mean modified prognostic index than control patients treated in the general wards, either before or after the introduction of coronary care. They also had a significantly shorter mean delay in admission than either group of general ward cases. These differences would be expected to worsen, not improve, the results of coronary care. By contrast, the two groups of general ward patients were very similar, as shown by mean modified prognostic index, mean admission delay, and results of correlation and regression analysis. In spite of their higher mean modified prognostic index and shorter mean admission delay, the coronary care unit patients had a significant reduction in their mortality rate, which dated from the opening of the unit, to little more than half that for the general ward patients. For general ward patients treated after the introduction of coronary care, on the other hand, the mortality rate was not significantly different from that for ones treated before. Furthermore, the reduction in mortality for coronary care unit cases was approximately the same over the whole range of infarct severity, and did not vary significantly from 15 per cent as the modified index rose from minimum to maximum values. It is suggested that severity of infarction should no longer be a reason for excluding any patients from coronary care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

B. L. Chapman (1979) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d9a8273c56dd1bd2fe514https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.42.4.386
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper