PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2008Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management230 citations

Qualitative management accounting research: rationale, pitfalls and potential

View Full Paper
JVJuhani Vaivio

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Purpose The paper aims to provide an overview of the rationale for qualitative research in management accounting. It discusses how qualitative research could serve the development of theory, and provides guiding principles for qualitative investigation. It also seeks to identify common problems in qualitative studies and lays out avenues for further qualitative inquiry. Design/methodology/approach The paper relies on critical reflection and deductive logic in its discussion, drawing on a wide range of theoretical pronouncements and methodological literature, as well as on some illustrative field studies in management accounting. Findings The paper opens a broad panorama: it emphasizes field research as a necessary counterweight to textbook appreciations of management accounting, to idealized economic models and to consultancy‐oriented agenda. It identifies how field research serves theory development in different ways, providing a set of practical principles which assist qualitative efforts. The paper also specifies pitfalls in qualitative studies and shows areas where the future potential of qualitative investigations can be focused. Practical implications This is a paper that motivates the “qualitative” management accounting scholar. But it also assists in a pragmatic way the qualitatively oriented management accounting scholar – especially someone with little prior experience in empirical fieldwork and in the theoretical interpretation of qualitative data. Originality/value The paper provides a source of inspiration, an instructive reflection and a practical guide for the qualitatively oriented, but still somewhat hesitant, management accounting scholar.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Juhani Vaivio (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d9f34cc9f7df1b705b751https://doi.org/10.1108/11766090810856787
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Contracting theory and accounting2001 · 1,032 citations
  2. 2THE IRRATIONALITY OF ACTION AND ACTION RATIONALITY: DECISIONS, IDEOLOGIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONS1982 · 539 citations
  3. 3The New Industrial State2007 · 2,467 citations
  4. 4The Politics of Management Knowledge.1998 · 108 citations
  5. 5Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s.1964 · 4,971 citations