PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2004Circulation Journal13 citationsOpen Access

Detecting Viable Myocardium and Predicting Functional Improvement-Comparisons of Positron Emission Tomography, Rest-Redistribution Thallium-201 Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT), Exercise Thallium-201 Reinjection SPECT, I-123 BMIPP SPECT and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography-

TTTomoko TaniMTMasakazu TeragakiHWHiroyuki Watanabe

Key Result

Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography demonstrated 90% sensitivity and 80% specificity for predicting functional recovery of viable myocardium after acute myocardial infarction.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=30)

Blinding

Single-blind

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography accurately predict functional recovery of viable myocardium in patients with acute myocardial infarction compared to nuclear imaging modalities?

P
Population
30 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at 10+/-3 days after the onset of AMI
I
Intervention
Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LDDE)
C
Comparator
Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), rest-redistribution thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography (RR-Tl SPECT), I-123 BMIPP SPECT, and exercise thallium-201 reinjection SPECT (RI-Tl SPECT)
O
Outcome
Functional recovery (improvement in wall motion) assessed by follow-up echocardiography at 5+/-3 months after interventional therapysurrogate

Limitations

  • Small number of patients
  • Visual assessment used for wall motion analysis in LDDE may be relatively insensitive to minor changes
  • Inability to evaluate myocardial viability when echocardiographic images are unclear
  • Segmental misalignment between LDDE and the other imaging methods

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LDDE) has become a useful and safe method for identifying hibernating or stunned myocardium and for predicting improvement in wall motion after coronary revascularization. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the present study, fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), rest-redistribution thallium-201 ((201)Tl) single-photon emission computed tomography (RR-Tl SPECT), (123)I-15-(p-iodophenyl)-3-(R,S)-methyl pentadecanoic acid (BMIPP) and LDDE were performed in 30 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at 10+/-3 days after the onset of AMI. Also, exercise (201)Tl reinjection SPECT (RI-Tl SPECT) was performed at 14+/-2 days. Follow-up echocardiography was performed 5+/-3 months later in all patients after interventional therapy for the assessment of functional recovery. Of the 390 segments analyzed by echocardiography, 110 (28%) had abnormal wall motion. There were no significant differences between RR-Tl SPECT and LDDE in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value using the chi(2)-test; however, in akinetic segments, there was a significant difference in sensitivity. Among FDG-PET, RI-Tl SPECT, BMIPP and LDDE, there were significant differences in 3 variables. In akinetic segments, LDDE is superior to RR-Tl SPECT in sensitivity and to FDG-PET in specificity. In hypokinetic segments, LDDE is superior to RI-Tl SPECT and BMIPP in sensitivity, and to FDG-PET and BMIPP in specificity. CONCLUSIONS: LDDE could detect functional recovery of viable myocardium in the early period of AMI and can be performed easily and safely.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tani et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=30). Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LDDE) vs. FDG-PET, RR-Tl SPECT, RI-Tl SPECT, and BMIPP SPECT was evaluated on Sensitivity for predicting functional recovery. Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography demonstrated 90% sensitivity and 80% specificity for predicting functional recovery of viable myocardium after acute myocardial infarction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1daaaf9df5fa36af4da4c0https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.68.950
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper