PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1978Circulation238 citationsOpen Access

A new method for measurement of sinoatrial conduction time.

View Full Paper
ONOnkar S. NarulaNSN. ShanthaMVMiguel Vasquez

Structured PICO

Does a new method using constant atrial pacing accurately measure sinoatrial conduction time compared to the Strauss method in patients?

P
Population
20 patients
I
Intervention
New method (NM) for estimation of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) utilizing constant atrial pacing (AP)
C
Comparator
Strauss method (SM) utilizing premature atrial beats (PABs)
O
Outcome
Sinoatrial conduction time (SACT)surrogate

A new method using constant atrial pacing provides a simple and highly correlated alternative to the Strauss method for measuring sinoatrial conduction time, and can be used even when the Strauss method fails due to fully compensatory intervals.

Abstract

This study describes a new method (NM) for estimation of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT), which utilizes constant atrial pacing (AP) instead of the premature atrial beats (PABs) used in the method reported in 1973 by Strauss et al. The SACTs were obtained by both methods in 20 patients. The SACT by the Strauss method (SM) was calculated as A2A3 minus A1A1. The NM consists of high right AP for a train of eight consecutive beats at rates less than or equal to 10 beats/min faster than the sinus rhythm. The interval between the last paced atrial electrogram (Ap) and the first escape atrial electrogram (A) of sinus origin (Ap-A) was measured along with several post pacing sinus cycles. The SACT by the NM was calculated as follows: SACT = Ap-A minus A1A1. The effect of AP at higher rates was also analyzed. In two patients, the SACT with the SM could not be defined, as all the A2A3 intervals were fully compensatory; with the NM the SACT was 217 and 320 msec. In the remaining 18 patients the SACT was obtainable by both methods. With SM, the SACT ranged 105--452 msec (mean 219 +/- 102 SD) and with the NM it was 85--492 msec (mean 201 +/- 112 SD), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0162). The coefficient of correlation between the two methods was r = 0.97. During AP at faster rates, a rate related increment in Ap-A intervals and also post pacing sinus cycles was noted. This study describes a new and simple method for measurement of SACT in man.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Narula et al. (1978) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ddd23c238e2f45834f5a8https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.58.4.706
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Premature Atrial Stimulation as a Key to the Understanding of Sinoatrial Conduction in Man1973 · 453 citations
  2. 2Significance of the Sinus-Node Recovery Time1972 · 463 citations
  3. 3SYNCOPAL ATTACKS, ASSOCIATED WITH PROLONGED ARREST OF THE WHOLE HEART1909 · 37 citations
  4. 4Comparative study of sinoatrial conduction time and sinus node recovery time.1975 · 54 citations
  5. 5Sinus node recovery time and calculated sinoatrial conduction time in normal subjects and patients with sinus node dysfunction.1977 · 111 citations