PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1995The Journals of Gerontology Series A98 citations

Measurement of Skeletal Muscle: Laboratory and Epidemiological Methods

View Full Paper
WEW. J. EvansSHSteven B. HeymsfieldDGDympna Gallagher

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Despite skeletal muscle's central role in the pathogenesis of sarcopenia, measurement methods remain underinvestigated and inadequately validated. Our review indicates that skeletal muscle (SM) measurement methods quantify different components and properties of muscle, ranging from the atomic to whole-body levels of body composition. Laboratory methods tend to measure whole body SM (e.g., total muscle protein, muscle cell mass, and adipose tissue-free SM components) while epidemiological methods tend to measure regional muscle (e.g., anatomic SM of an extremity). Advances in computerized axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging methods now allow accurate estimates of whole body and regional SM and promise to finally permit comprehensive in vivo studies of SM biology and methodology. These imaging methods may help to resolve many of the confusing issues that surround the investigation of this major body composition component.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Evans et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1de106ef3fa0b4c0ef822ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/50a.special_issue.23
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper