PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2021BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine13 citationsOpen Access

Applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby codes: a systematic-scoping review and consensus on future research priorities protocol

OHOmar HeywardSEStacey EmmondsGRGregory Roe

Structured PICO

P
Population
Literature and experts in women's rugby (rugby league, rugby union, and rugby sevens)
I
Intervention
Systematic-scoping review and three-round Delphi consensus method
O
Outcome
Identification of future research priorities in applied sport science and medicine of women's rugby

This protocol outlines a systematic-scoping review and Delphi consensus to identify future research priorities in applied sport science and medicine for women's rugby.

Abstract

Women's rugby (rugby league, rugby union and rugby sevens) has recently grown in participation and professionalisation. There is under-representation of women-only cohorts within applied sport science and medicine research and within the women's rugby evidence base. The aims of this article are: Part 1: to undertake a systematic-scoping review of the applied sport science and medicine of women's rugby, and Part 2: to develop a consensus statement on future research priorities. This article will be designed in two parts: Part 1: a systematic-scoping review, and Part 2: a three-round Delphi consensus method. For Part 1, systematic searches of three electronic databases (PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost)) will be performed from the earliest record. These databases will be searched to identify any sport science and medicine themed studies within women's rugby. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews will be adhered to. Part 2 involves a three-round Delphi consensus method to identify future research priorities. Identified experts in women's rugby will be provided with overall findings from Part 1 to inform decision-making. Participants will then be asked to provide a list of research priority areas. Over the three rounds, priority areas achieving consensus (≥70% agreement) will be identified. This study has received institutional ethical approval. When complete, the manuscript will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The findings of this article will have relevance for a wide range of stakeholders in women's rugby, including policymakers and governing bodies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heyward et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1df308520f01455d6018c8https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001108
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper