PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2022American Heart Journal Plus Cardiology Research and Practice6 citationsOpen Access

Clinical predictors of improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction in U.S. veterans with heart failure

SNShriram NallamshettyAVAdrián Alejandro Vitón-CastilloANAndrew Nguyen

Structured PICO

What are the clinical predictors of LVEF improvement in US veterans with heart failure and initial LVEF <40%?

P
Population
106,414 US veterans with a new diagnosis of heart failure, initial LVEF <40% in the 12 months prior to diagnosis, and follow-up LVEF assessment at least 6 months after diagnosis
O
Outcome
Improvement in LVEF to ≥40% (HFimpEF)surrogate

In a large cohort of US veterans with HFrEF, several clinical factors predicted LVEF improvement to ≥40%, though the combined discriminatory value of these predictors was modest.

Limitations

  • Modest combined discriminatory value for LVEF improvement

Abstract

Our understanding of the factors associated with improvement of LVEF and a heart failure with improved EF (HFimpEF) phenotype remains incomplete. We conducted a retrospective study using a national database of patients followed in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health system with serial assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiography. We identified US veterans with a new diagnosis of heart failure with: (i) LVEF of 40 % after a median follow up of 5 years. Multivariate regression analysis identified several factors that were independently associated with LVEF improvement including female sex, younger age, higher BMI, and a history of specific comorbid conditions such as hypertension, valve disease, atrial fibrillation, connective tissue disease, liver disease, and malignancy (p < 0.001). Conversely, a history of ischemic heart disease and peripheral arterial disease, as well as specific racial backgrounds (Black and Hispanic) were associated with lower rates of LVEF improvement. The model c-statistic for predicting LVEF improvement was 0.70. This large, detailed dataset facilitated an analysis of a large number of variables that significantly associated with HFimpEF; however, their combined discriminatory value for LVEF improvement remained modest, underscoring the complexity of the gene-environment-treatment interactions that govern LV function.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nallamshetty et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e060ea3f4c58cc93531fchttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100183
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction: Insight into the Variable Nature of Left Ventricular Systolic Function2022 · 21 citations
  2. 2Variability of left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiovascular patients with and without heart failure2025
  3. 3In‐Hospital Improved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Prognosis in Acute Heart Failure2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Longitudinal Characteristics Associated with Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction2023 · 1 citations
  5. 5Temporal left ventricular ejection fraction variations and outcomes in wide population of cardiovascular patients with and without heart failure2025