PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2013Environmental Health Perspectives112 citationsOpen Access

Cancer Incidence in World Trade Center Rescue and Recovery Workers, 2001–2008

View Full Paper
SSSamara SolanSWSylvan WallensteinMSMoshe Shapiro

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: World Trade Center (WTC) rescue and recovery workers were exposed to a complex mix of pollutants and carcinogens. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate cancer incidence in responders during the first 7 years after 11 September 2001. METHODS: Cancers among 20,984 consented participants in the WTC Health Program were identified through linkage to state tumor registries in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare cancers diagnosed in responders to predicted numbers for the general population. Multivariate regression models were used to estimate associations with degree of exposure. RESULTS: A total of 575 cancers were diagnosed in 552 individuals. Increases above registry-based expectations were noted for all cancer sites combined (SIR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.25), thyroid cancer (SIR = 2.39; 95% CI: 1.70, 3.27), prostate cancer (SIR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.44), combined hematopoietic and lymphoid cancers (SIR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.71), and soft tissue cancers (SIR = 2.26; 95% CI: 1.13, 4.05). When restricted to 302 cancers diagnosed ≥ 6 months after enrollment, the SIR for all cancers decreased to 1.06 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.18), but thyroid and prostate cancer diagnoses remained greater than expected. All cancers combined were increased in very highly exposed responders and among those exposed to significant amounts of dust, compared with responders who reported lower levels of exposure. CONCLUSION: Estimates should be interpreted with caution given the short follow-up and long latency period for most cancers, the intensive medical surveillance of this cohort, and the small numbers of cancers at specific sites. However, our findings highlight the need for continued follow-up and surveillance of WTC responders.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Solan et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e3b067f6e8bbb2368aa35https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205894
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Association Between World Trade Center Exposure and Excess Cancer Risk2012 · 123 citations
  2. 2Statistical Methods in Cancer Research1980 · 6,726 citations
  3. 3Biomonitoring of chemical exposure among New York City firefighters responding to the World Trade Center fire and collapse.2003 · 129 citations
  4. 4Trends in Dermatology: Melanoma Incidence2010 · 56 citations
  5. 5Lung Cancer Screening with CT: Mayo Clinic Experience2003 · 675 citations