PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 2, 2026Advanced Functional Materials0 citations

Selective Interfacial Repair Enables Low‐Energy Regeneration of Spent LiFePO 4 to High‐Performance Cathode

View Full Paper
YYYajing YuSGShuaiqi Gong晨何晨旭 何

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a low-energy method for regenerating degraded LiFePO4 cathodes in a sustainable manner.
  • Utilized air pre-oxidation at 500°C to remove carbon/binder and convert Li-deficient olivine.
  • Applied hydrothermal treatment with ascorbic acid for selective Fe3+ reduction and Li+ replenishment.
  • Conducted technology-economic analysis to evaluate energy consumption and profitability.
  • Regenerated OR-LFP provides an initial capacity of 155.7 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C and 147.1 mAh g−1 at 1 C.
  • Maintained 94.5% capacity after 500 cycles at 1 C and 93.8% at 5 C.
  • Required only 5.87 MJ kg−1 energy and yielded approximately $0.80 kg−1 profit, indicating over tenfold higher profitability than conventional methods.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recycling degraded LiFePO 4 (LFP) cathodes via conventional pyro‐ (pyrometallurgy) or hydro‐ (hydrometallurgy) is energy‐intensive, generates toxic emissions, and yields meagre profits. Here, we report a low‐energy oxidation‐reduction (O‐R) strategy that bypasses element separation: air pre‐oxidation (500°C) removes carbon/binder, converting lithium‐deficient olivine into Li 3 Fe 2 (PO 4) 3 /Fe 2 O 3 intermediates; hydrothermal treatment with ascorbic acid enables selective Fe 3+ reduction (adsorption energy −2. 98 eV) and concurrent Li + replenishment. This reconstructs the lattice, halves Fe‐Li antisite defects (4. 38% to 2. 00%) and lowers Li + migration activation energy to 54. 48 kJ mol −1. Regenerated OR‐LFP delivers an initial capacity of 155. 7 mAh g −1 at 0. 1 C and 147. 1 mAh g −1 at 1 C, retains 94. 5% capacity after 500 cycles at 1 C and 93. 8% at 5 C, and shows superior rate capability. Technology‐economic analysis reveals O‐R requires only 5. 87 MJ kg −1 (less than half the energy of hydro‐ or pyro‐) and yields ≈0. 80 kg −1 profit, over tenfold higher than conventional routes, with minimal CO 2 emission. The process uses existing hydrothermal reactors and moderate‐temperature furnaces, enabling feasible industrial scaling. This work bridges high‐performance cathode regeneration with circular‐economy viability for sustainable LIB recycling.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e72cb30b38c64201b6007https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.76162
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries2018 · 3,245 citations
  2. 2Examining different recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries2019 · 955 citations
  3. 3Twin boundary defect engineering improves lithium-ion diffusion for fast-charging spinel cathode materials2021 · 216 citations
  4. 4High Li+ Transference Number Electrolyte Enabled by Fluoride Acceptor for Low-Temperature Li-Ion Batteries2025 · 11 citations
  5. 5Exceptionally long-cycle all-solid-state lithium metal batteries enabled by a 3D aluminum foam interlayers2025 · 8 citations