PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 2, 2026International Journal of Energy Research0 citationsOpen Access

Driving Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030: Energy Consumption–Digital Economy Nexus and Sociopolitical Forces

View Full Paper
MIMd. Monirul IslamMIMd. Saiful IslamARAnis ur Rehman

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how clean and dirty energy consumption affects economic growth and digital economy development in Saudi Arabia.
  • Analyzed monthly data from January 2010 to December 2024.
  • Utilized partial cross-quantilogram and time-varying quantile causality approaches to assess nonnormality and nonstationarity.
  • Evaluated the roles of sociopolitical forces, including legislative capacity and people's power, on digital economic growth.
  • Clean energy consumption positively influences digital economy growth across various market states.
  • Dirty energy consumption benefits economic growth primarily during booming markets, but negatively impacts in other scenarios.
  • Both legislative and people's power significantly enhance digital economy development when interacting with energy consumption.

Abstract

This research examines the roles of clean (solar) and dirty (oil) energy consumption in Saudi Arabia’s economic growth, with particular emphasis on digital economy (DGE) development, while accounting for cyclical shocks in energy prices and the sociopolitical forces of legislative and people’s power. Using monthly data from January 2010 to December 2024, and employing partial cross‐quantilogram (PCQ) and time‐varying quantile causality (TV‐QC) approaches to address nonnormality and nonstationarity, the results reveal that clean energy consumption strongly supports digital economic development across slack to booming markets, whereas dirty energy consumption exhibits a positive effect only in extreme booming markets and an adverse effect elsewhere. Both energy sources play asymmetric, context‐dependent roles in aggregate economic growth regardless of market conditions. The negative cyclical shock to solar photovoltaic (PV) prices is more pronounced in monthly than annual periods across bull markets, while the opposite holds for oil price shocks. Turning to sociopolitical forces, legislative capacity shows mixed effects, whereas people’s power significantly drives DGE growth. Critically, both legislative and people’s power exert positive moderating effects when interacting with energy consumption, collectively spurring digital economic development across all market conditions. We recommend policies that optimize the use of both energy resources within a framework that integrates effective legislative regulation with genuine popular will to advance Saudi Arabia’s sustainable transition under Vision 2030.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Islam et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e738130b38c64201b68e4https://doi.org/10.1155/er/3550276
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Saudi Arabia's Digital Innovation Trajectories: Interlinkages Between Oil Exports, Fiscal Shocks, Financial Stress, and Legislation2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Effectiveness of using e-government platform “Absher” as a tool for noncommunicable diseases survey in Saudi Arabia 2019–2020: A cross-sectional study2022 · 6 citations
  3. 3Dynamic impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on CO2 emission and economic growth in Saudi Arabia: Fresh evidence from wavelet coherence analysis2023 · 173 citations
  4. 4Digital economy, government efficiency, and regional administrative monopolies: Evidence from China2024 · 9 citations
  5. 5The role of energy in economic growth2011 · 558 citations