PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 2006Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology5 citations

Clinical Experience with Tiered Atrial Therapies and Atrial Arrhythmia Prevention Algorithms in a Dual Chamber Cardioverter Defibrillator

View Full Paper
EDEmile G. DaoudKNKoonlawee NademaneeCFCharles E. Fuenzalida

Structured PICO

Do advanced atrial detection and prevention algorithms in a dual chamber ICD effectively detect and treat atrial arrhythmias without compromising ventricular fibrillation detection?

P
Population
95 patients implanted with a dual chamber ICD at 25 US centers. 10 patients received a coronary sinus (CS) lead.
I
Intervention
Dual chamber ICD (Model 1900) with advanced atrial detection and new algorithms designed to prevent atrial arrhythmias (features ON)
C
Comparator
Features OFF (for detection time) and crossover control for preventative pacing
O
Outcome
Effectiveness of advanced atrial detection and prevention algorithms (including VF detection time, appropriateness of detection, shock conversion efficacy, and prevention of AT/AF)surrogate

Enhanced atrial detection and tiered therapies in a dual-chamber ICD effectively treat atrial arrhythmias without compromising ventricular fibrillation detection, though preventative pacing algorithms lacked clinical efficacy.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The acceptance of atrial arrhythmia features in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) will depend on their ability to appropriately discriminate atrial tachyarrhythmias/atrial fibrillation (AT/AF). This study tested the effectiveness of an atrial/ventricular ICD with advanced atrial detection and new algorithms designed to prevent atrial arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were implanted with a dual chamber ICD (Model 1900, Guidant Corporation, MN, USA) at 25 US centers. Ten patients received a coronary sinus (CS) lead allowing a defibrillation vector for AT/AF cardioversion. Follow-up was 12.2 months. The addition of new atrial features designed for detection, discrimination, and prevention of AT/AF had no adverse effect upon detection of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) (mean detection time with new features ON was 2.22 seconds vs 2.19 seconds with features OFF). A total of 100% of the induced and spontaneous ventricular and atrial arrhythmias receiving shock therapy were reviewed as appropriate detection. Atrial shock conversion efficacy for spontaneous and induced AT/AF episodes was 83% and 96%, respectively (144 spontaneous, 162 induced episodes). A 3-month randomized crossover trial of atrial preventative pacing features did not result in adverse effects, but there was no clinical efficacy for prevention of AT/AF. CONCLUSION: Enhanced atrial detection and discrimination features combined with tiered atrial therapies did not adversely impact the ability of the ICD (Model 1900) to appropriately detect and treat ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Daoud et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e744c7f6e8bbb2368ee97https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00498.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper