PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2011Energy Procedia61 citationsOpen Access

Monitoring the CO2 injection site: K12-B

View Full Paper
VVVincent VandeweijerBMBert van der MeerCHC. Hofstee

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The K12-B gas field is located in the Dutch sector of the North Sea. The top of the reservoir lies approximately 3800 meters below sea level, and the ambient temperature of the reservoir is over 127 °C. The K12-B gas field has been producing natural gas from 1987 onwards and is currently operated by GDF SUEZ E&P Nederland B.V. The natural gas has an initial CO2 content of 13%, which is relatively high. Since the start of the gas production the CO2 component has been separated from the natural gas stream on-site and since 2004 part of the separated CO2 is re-injected into the gas field. In 2004 a demonstration project commenced where CO2 was re-injected into K12-B. The goal was to investigate the feasibility of CO2 injection and storage in depleted natural gas fields. More than 6 years later CO2 injection is still taking place and numerous monitoring techniques have been applied in order to get a better understanding of various aspects of underground CO2 storage in nearly depleted gas fields. Over the years monitoring activities have mainly focused on the well integrity and on the behavior of the CO2 in the well and reservoir. The cap rock present at K12-B consists of hundreds of meters of rock salts from the Zechstein Super Group. The most likely migration pathway for any gas, should migration occur at all is therefore along the well bores. Establishing the conditions of wells is of great importance for safety issues. Some of the tools which have been used will be discussed. Another goal for the various monitoring activities is to gain a better understanding of the behavior of the CO2 in the injection wells and the migration of the CO2 in the reservoir. How the CO2 migrates in the reservoir is important as regards the assessment of the potential for enhanced gas recovery (EGR) by CO2 injection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vandeweijer et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e7e7a7f6e8bbb2368ff58https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.532
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1K12-B2009 · 9 citations
  2. 2CO2 Storage and Enhanced Gas Recovery at K12-B2009 · 11 citations
  3. 3Carbon dioxide disposal from coal-based IGCC's in depleted gas fields1992 · 93 citations
  4. 4K12-B A Test Site for Co2 Storage and Enhanced Gas Recovery2005 · 40 citations
  5. 5Process Modeling of CO 2 Injection into Natural Gas Reservoirs for Carbon Sequestration and Enhanced Gas Recovery2001 · 343 citations