PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2007The Journal of Positive Psychology230 citations

Implicit theories of courage

View Full Paper
CRChristopher R. RateJCJennifer A. ClarkeDLDouglas R. Lindsay

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

What is courage? This question garners significant interest and attention but little empirical research. An operational definition of courage is essential to good research, yet no consensus definition has fully emerged. This article systematically investigates people's conceptions of courage and courageous behavior through a series of studies employing well-grounded implicit methodologies. The organizational structure and components of courage are investigated using a response-generating task (Study 1) and alternate methods (Studies 2 and 3), followed by an experimental approach to determine if people actually use their implicit theories in their evaluations of others (Study 4). Collectively, these studies reveal an organizational structure of people's implicit theories of courage. Further, they indicate that people apply their implicit theories accurately in evaluating others. Then, Laches, suppose that we first set about determining the nature of courage … Tell me, if you can, what is courage Socrates (Plato, trans. 1987 Plato. 1987. “Laches (J. H. Nichols, Jr. Trans.). In T. L. Pangle (Ed.)”. In The roots of political philosophy: Ten forgotten Socratic dialogues, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rate et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e8963c07483b92c560331https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701228755
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper