PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1998Acta Physiologica Scandinavica65 citations

Comparison of the cellular electrophysiological characteristics of canine left ventricular epicardium, M cells, endocardium and Purkinje fibres

View Full Paper
BBALÁTIVVV VarróPPapp

Structured PICO

P
Population
Isolated dog left ventricular preparations (canine ventricle cells: M cells, epicardium, endocardium, and Purkinje fibres)
I
Intervention
Pharmacological agents (tetrodotoxin, nifedipine, pinacidil) and varying stimulation cycle lengths
C
Comparator
Comparisons among the different cell types (M cells vs. epicardium, endocardium, and Purkinje fibres)
O
Outcome
Electrophysiological characteristics and pharmacological responsessurrogate

The study confirms the existence of M cells in the canine ventricle and highlights key electrophysiological and pharmacological differences between M cells and Purkinje fibres.

Abstract

Electrophysiological differences among M cells, epicardium, endocardium and Purkinje fibres of the canine ventricle were studied over a wide range of stimulation cycle lengths, and the pharmacological response of these cell types to the sodium channel blocker tetrodotoxin, calcium channel blocker nifedipine and ATP-sensitive potassium channel activator pinacidil was compared. The experiments were carried out by applying standard intracellular microelectrode technique in isolated dog left ventricular preparations. The results confirmed the existence of M cells in the canine ventricle, in addition, the distribution of the rate of rise of the action potential upstroke and action potential amplitude values reflecting probably the inhomogeneity of the fast sodium current in these cells was revealed. It was also demonstrated that M cells differ from Purkinje fibres in some aspects which were not expected from previous investigations: (1) The early portion of the action potential duration restitution curve in M cells is more similar to that of endocardial and epicardial cells than to Purkinje fibres. (2) The plateau phase of the action potentials in Purkinje fibres developed at a more negative potential range than that in the other cell types studied. (3) The pharmacological response to tetrodotoxin and pinacidil in M cells resembles to that in the endocardial and epicardial cells more than in the Purkinje fibres. Our results provide further evidence in support of the existence of M cells but also indicate that there are important electrophysiological as well as pharmacological differences between M cells and Purkinje fibres.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

BALÁTI et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ea900e5c5a32e9d9a6cc6https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-201x.1998.00416.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rate-dependent differences in dog epi- and endocardial monophasic action potential configuration in vivo1991 · 22 citations
  2. 2Glass Microelectrode Studies on Intramural Papillary Muscle Cells1974 · 41 citations
  3. 3Regional effects of verapamil on recovery of excitability and conduction time in experimental ischemia.1987 · 27 citations
  4. 4Effect of tetrodotoxin on action potentials of the conducting system in the dog heart1979 · 242 citations
  5. 5A subpopulation of cells with unique electrophysiological properties in the deep subepicardium of the canine ventricle. The M cell.1991 · 501 citations