PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 26, 2022Earth-Science Reviews25 citationsOpen Access

Climate change hotspots and implications for the global subsea telecommunications network

View Full Paper
MCMichael ClareIYIsobel YeoLBLucy Bricheno

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A global network of subsea telecommunications cables underpins our daily lives, enabling >95% of global digital data transfer, trillions/day in financial trading, and providing critical communications links, particularly to remote, low-income countries. Despite their importance, subsea cables and their landing stations are vulnerable to damage by natural hazards, including storm surges, waves, cyclones, earthquakes, floods, volcanic eruptions, submarine landslides and ice scour. However, the likelihood or recurrence interval of many of these types of events will likely change under future projected climate change scenarios, compounded by sea-level rise; potentially increasing hazard severity, creating previously unanticipated hazards, or hazards may shift to new locations during the 20–30-year operational life of cable systems. To date, no study has assessed the wide-reaching impacts of future climate change on subsea cables and landing stations on a global scale. Here, for the first time we synthesize the current evidence base, based on published peer-reviewed datasets, to fill this crucial knowledge gap, specifically to assess how and where future climate change is likely to impact subsea cables and their shore-based infrastructure. We find that ocean conditions are highly likely to change on a global basis as a result of climate change, but the feedbacks and links between climate change, natural processes and human activities are often complicated, resulting in a high degree of geographic variability. We identify climate change ‘hotspots’ (regions and locations likely to experience the greatest impacts) but find that not all areas will be affected in the same manner, nor synchronously by the same processes. We conclude that cable routes should carefully consider locally-variable drivers of hazard frequency and magnitude. Consideration should be given both to instantaneous events (e. g. landslides, tropical cyclones) as well as longer-term, sustained impacts (e. g. seabed currents that circulate even in deep water). Multiple factors can combine to increase the risk posed to subsea cables, hence a holistic approach is essential to assess the compounded effects of both natural processes and human activities in the future.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Clare et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1eac80bf2a5d44faaf2abehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104296
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predicting September sea ice: Ensemble skill of the SEARCH Sea Ice Outlook 2008-20132014 · 201 citations
  2. 2The Tides They Are A‐Changin': A Comprehensive Review of Past and Future Nonastronomical Changes in Tides, Their Driving Mechanisms, and Future Implications2019 · 292 citations
  3. 3Bottom trawling reduces benthic denitrification and has the potential to influence the global nitrogen cycle2020 · 54 citations
  4. 4Iceberg scouring in Scoresby Sund and on the East Greenland continental shelf1993 · 155 citations
  5. 5Changes in Winter North Atlantic Extratropical Cyclones in High-Resolution Regional Pseudo–Global Warming Simulations2017 · 110 citations