PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 15, 2010Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology34 citations

Right Ventricular Septal Pacing: A Comparative Study of Outflow Tract and Mid Ventricular Sites

View Full Paper
RRRaphaël RossoCMC. MediATA. Teh

Key Result

RV outflow tract septal pacing resulted in a similar paced QRS duration compared to mid-RV septal pacing (151 ± 14 ms vs 145 ± 13 ms; P=0.150).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=17)

Structured PICO

Does RVOT septal pacing improve QRS duration and pacing parameters compared to mid-RV septal pacing in patients with an indication for dual-chamber pacing?

P
Population
17 consecutive patients with an indication for dual-chamber pacing.
E
Exposure
Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) septal pacing using standard 58-cm active fixation leads and a commercially available septal stylet
C
Comparator
Mid-right ventricular (mid-RV) septal pacing using standard 58-cm active fixation leads and a commercially available septal stylet
O
Outcome
QRS duration, morphology, and pacing parameters (mean stimulation threshold, R-wave sensing, and lead impedance)surrogate

Septal pacing can be reliably achieved in both the RVOT and mid-RV with active fixation leads, with no significant difference in acute lead performance or paced QRS duration between the two sites.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 151% vs 145%

p-value: p=0.150

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prolonged right ventricle (RV) apical pacing is associated with left ventricle (LV) dysfunction due to dysynchronous ventricular activation and contraction. Alternative RV pacing sites with a narrower QRS compared to RV pacing might reflect a more physiological and synchronous LV activation. The purpose of this study was to compare the QRS morphology, duration, and suitability of RV outflow tract (RVOT) septal and mid-RV septal pacing. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients with indication for dual-chamber pacing were enrolled in the study. Two standard 58-cm active fixation leads were passed to the RV and positioned in the RVOT septum and mid-RV septum using a commercially available septal stylet (model 4140, St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). QRS duration, morphology, and pacing parameters were compared at the two sites. The RV lead with less-satisfactory electrical parameters was withdrawn and deployed in the right atrium. RESULTS: Successful positioning of the pacing leads at the RVOT septum and mid-RV septum was achieved in 15 patients (88.2%). There were no significant differences in the mean stimulation threshold, R-wave sensing, and lead impedance between the two sites. The QRS duration in the RVOT septum was 151 ± 14 ms and in the mid-RV septum 145 ± 13 ms (P = 0.150). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective observational study shows that septal pacing can be reliably achieved both in the RVOT and mid-RV with active fixation leads using a specifically shaped stylet. There are no preferences in regard to acute lead performance or paced QRS duration with either position.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rosso et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Indication for dual-chamber pacing (n=17). RV outflow tract (RVOT) septal pacing vs. Mid-RV septal pacing was evaluated on QRS duration (p=0.150). RV outflow tract septal pacing resulted in a similar paced QRS duration compared to mid-RV septal pacing (151 ± 14 ms vs 145 ± 13 ms; P=0.150).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1eb6b8db9b8de29fa422e7https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02836.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper