PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 27, 1998Circulation83 citationsOpen Access

Myocardial Contractility Is Not Constant During Spontaneous Atrial Fibrillation in Patients

View Full Paper
CBCarl BrookesPWPaul A. WhiteMSMaurice Staples

Structured PICO

Does myocardial contractility vary from beat to beat during spontaneous atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
10 patients (6 in atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization for diagnostic purposes and 4 control patients in sinus rhythm undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery)
I
Intervention
Continuous measurement of left ventricular pressure and volume using a conductance catheter with catheter-tip micromanometer
C
Comparator
Control patients in sinus rhythm
O
Outcome
End-systolic pressure-volume relationshipsurrogate

Myocardial contractility constantly changes from beat to beat in atrial fibrillation due to force-interval relationships, challenging the assumption of a single state of contractility.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The variation in stroke volume and pulse pressure characteristic of atrial fibrillation is usually ascribed to time-dependent ventricular filling, implying a single positive relationship between end-systolic pressure and volume, which defines a single state of myocardial contractility. We tested the hypothesis that contractility also varies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured the left ventricular pressure and volume continuously with a conductance catheter with catheter-tip micromanometer introduced retrogradely into the left ventricle. The end-systolic pressure-volume relationship was determined in 6 patients in atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization for diagnostic purposes and 4 control patients in sinus rhythm undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The normal positive relationship between end-systolic pressure and volume was found in the control patients, but no such positive relationship was found in any patient in atrial fibrillation. In the latter, the slopes of the linear regressions were either not significantly different from zero or significantly negative (r values <0.08), both results indicating a change in contractility from beat to beat. Significantly negative relationships were found between end-systolic volume and preceding R-R interval (-0.82<r<-0.24), indicating the presence of mechanical restitution. Significantly positive relationships were found between end-systolic volume and the R-R interval before the preceding R-R interval (0.35<r<0.74), indicating the presence of postextrasystolic potentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial contractility is constantly changing from beat to beat in atrial fibrillation because of the influence of the force-interval relationships.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brookes et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ebc8f6b4935698da4439chttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.98.17.1762
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Factors influencing the ejection fraction and the mean rate of circumferential fibre shortening during atrial fibrillation in man1974 · 64 citations
  2. 2Continuous stroke volume and cardiac output from intra-ventricular dimensions obtained with impedance catheter1981 · 300 citations
  3. 3Characterisation of decay of frequency induced potentiation and post-extrasystolic potentiation1990 · 25 citations
  4. 4Computer Analysis of the RR Interval-Contractility Relationship during Random Stimulation of the Isolated Heart1968 · 39 citations
  5. 5Intracellular calcium transients underlying the short‐term force‐interval relationship in ferret ventricular myocardium.1986 · 269 citations