PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1992American Journal of Hypertension129 citationsOpen Access

Quality of Life in Treatment of Hypertension: A Metaanalysis of Clinical Trials

View Full Paper
JBJudith A. BetoVBV. Bansal

Structured PICO

Does antihypertensive drug therapy improve quality of life in patients with hypertension?

P
Population
1,620 patients with hypertension from 9 published trials (27 population groups)
I
Intervention
Antihypertensive drug therapy (14 drugs from 6 pharmacological groups, including ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and diuretics)
C
Comparator
Baseline (placebo or no treatment) with patients as their own control
O
Outcome
Quality of life (QL) constructs: sexual function, sleep, psychomotor, general well-being, and moodpatient reported

Antihypertensive drug therapy provides small improvements in sleep, psychomotor function, general well-being, and mood, with no negative effects on overall quality of life.

Limitations

  • Narrower demographics and smaller sample sizes may have biased similar positive effects in calcium-channel blockers and diuretics

Abstract

A metaanalysis was performed to determine the effects on quality of life (QL) in hypertension as reported in published clinical trials of antihypertensive drug therapy. All studies included compared active treatment to baseline (placebo or no treatment) with the patients as their own control and used blinded, randomized trials. Change was measured by self and/or interviewer-assisted evaluation, standardized psychomotor/cognitive tests, or sleep laboratory observations. After an exhaustive literature search (1970 to 1990), nine published trials of 27 population groups (n = 1620) using 14 drugs from six pharmacological groups met selection criteria and were analyzed for five QL constructs: sexual function, sleep, psychomotor, general well-being, and mood. Small positive effect size (d) improvement with treatment was seen for sleep (d = 0.106), psychomotor (d = 0.283), general well-being (d = 0.139), and mood (d = 0.167) while no effect could be determined for sexual function (d = -0.030) based on 95% confidence intervals. Either a comparably small improvement with treatment or no effect was seen among various pharmacological drug groups; no negative effect with treatment was identified. A larger positive effect could be postulated if the drug choice was individualized to the patient rather than randomized as in clinical trial methodology. Although none of the drug groups had a clearly superior effect, a more frequent positive effect with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers was seen for all constructs. Narrower demographics and smaller sample sizes may have biased similar positive effects in calcium-channel blockers and diuretics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Beto et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ed0f5eed4f0c78fa4479dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/5.3.125
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper