PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1997Academic Emergency Medicine119 citationsOpen Access

Statistical Methodology: II. Reliability and Validity Assessment in Study Design, Part B

View Full Paper
DKDavid J. Karros

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Assessment of test reliability and validity is often complex. Although tests of correlation are frequently used to measure interest agreement, such indexes measure only the strength of the linear relationship between variables and may not provide an accurate assessment of the correspondence between test results. Inspection of interest differences, either visually or using the r1, may provide a better indicator of the correspondence between test results and accounts for measurement biases. Strength of association between categorical variables can be measured using related tests such as the kappa statistic. Test reliability may be assessed by retesting, but this is not practical in many cases when subject memory or learning may confound the results of repeated examinations. Several methods exist for determining reliability from a single test administration and for assessing the correspondence between answers to homogeneous test questions. In the continuation article (Part B) on this subject, the concept and assessment of validity will be examined in more detail, and techniques for maximizing the reliability and validity of questionnaires will be discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

David J. Karros (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ef8331baba023eb6b5930https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03723.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper