PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1993Image the Journal of Nursing Scholarship86 citations

The Statistical versus Clinical Significance Debate

View Full Paper
SLSandra LeFort

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

There is general agreement that tests of statistical significance do not provide information about the clinical significance or practical importance of research results. Yet the concept of clinical significance has received little discussion or debate in the nursing literature. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast statistical and clinical significance, to provide an overview of the issues surrounding their uses as described in the methodological literature from a variety of disciplines, and to discuss some implications of these concepts for nursing research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sandra LeFort (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f174e0a1e4e63fe9145a7https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00754.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Meta-Analysis1989 · 18 citations
  2. 2On the relation of clinical research to clinical practice: Current issues, new directions.1981 · 215 citations
  3. 3*, **, and ***; Statistical Nonsense At the .00000 Level1991 · 18 citations
  4. 4Designing experiments and analyzing data: a model comparison perspective1990 · 671 citations
  5. 5Life of the mind: The interface of psychopharmaceuticals, domestic economies, and social abandonment2004 · 902 citations