PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1980Soil Science5 citations

Soil Phosphorus Tests on California Subclover-Annual Grass Pastures

View Full Paper
CVCharles E. VaughnMJMilton B. Jones

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We evaluated the phosphorus fertility of 19 typical, California, annual grassland, pasture soils by comparing nine soil P tests: total, Bray and Kurtz methods 1 and 2, two Olsen extractions (1:10 and 1:20 soil: extractant ratios), and the “North Carolina,” Truog, Morgan, and Bingham methods. Soil P test results were correlated with subclover-annual grass forage production and P content in the field and in the greenhouse. Correlation of soil P with actual yields and P uptake was generally better in the field than in the greenhouse. Phosphorus in the Bray and Kurtz 1 and the Olsen 1:10 and 1:20 extracts gave the best predictions of field forage production (respectively, r = 0.82, 0.73, and 0.67; P < 0.01). The relative values of the various tests in predicting field forage P content were quite similar with actual yields. The Bray and Kurtz 1 method was the most precise (r = 0.87), and the Olsen extracts were also highly correlated (P < 0.01). Bray and Kurtz 1 extractable soil P accounted for about 67 percent of the variation in subclover-annual grass forage yield and about 76 percent of the variation in forage P content. These were about 14 percent higher than with the Olsen extractants. When we consider relative precision and facility (a 60-second extraction time), the Bray and Kurtz 1 method appears to be of greater potential value for routine testing of annual pasture soils in north-coastal California.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vaughn et al. (1980) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f28540a1e4e63fe915ba1https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198012000-00003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper