PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 10, 2025Restoration Ecology1 citationsOpen Access

Community structure and functional traits mediate hyperspectral prediction of biomass in restored grasslands

View Full Paper
YLYang LuoYMYingkun MouYGYanjun Guan

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Hyperspectral techniques enable rapid non‐destructive prediction of vegetation characteristics, offering an effective method for monitoring grassland restoration status. There are still gaps in the utilization of field hyperspectral techniques to assess the specific grassland characteristics on the Loess Plateau. Objectives This study aimed to develop a predictive model for spectral parameters and community characteristics of restored grasslands using hyperspectral techniques, providing a feasible method for monitoring grassland restoration status. Methods A field spectrometer was applied to collect spectral parameters of visible, red‐edge, and near‐infrared (NIR) wavebands, and 16 vegetation indices (VIs) were calculated. A field investigation was conducted on community structural characteristics, functional traits, and aboveground biomass (AGB). Results Grassland community diversity and height were primarily correlated with the blue‐violet and NIR wavebands. The red and blue‐violet wavebands exhibited the highest sensitivity to canopy pigment content. The red‐edge and visible wavebands were the most critical for estimating grassland community AGB and canopy water content. The dominance of soil‐adjusted indices (e.g. Optimized Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index, Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index) could effectively estimate canopy coverage, water content, and AGB. Significant indirect relationships were observed between VIs and AGB. Conclusions The optimized prediction model was developed using field hyperspectral techniques, highlighting the mediating roles of community structure and functional traits in predicting biomass from vegetation indices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Luo et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f329d47e59f9ba32329cdhttps://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70254
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Integrating imaging spectroscopy and neural networks to map grass quality in the Kruger National Park, South Africa2004 · 189 citations
  2. 2Spectral Reflectance Characteristics and Chlorophyll Content Estimation Model of Quercus aquifolioides Leaves at Different Altitudes in Sejila Mountain2020 · 35 citations
  3. 3Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories2014 · 1,151 citations
  4. 4Sensitivity of the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) to Topographic Effects: A Case Study in High-density Cypress Forest2007 · 841 citations
  5. 5Physiological analysis and transcriptome profiling reveals the impact of microplastic on melon (Cucumis melo L.) seed germination and seedling growth2023 · 29 citations