PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2002South African Journal of Psychiatry18 citationsOpen Access

Patterns and determinants of acute psychiatric readmissions

View Full Paper
GBGraham BehrCCCathy ChristieNSN. Söderlund

Key Result

Neither length of hospital stay nor the use of depot neuroleptics significantly impacted the time to psychiatric readmission, whereas being married or cohabiting provided a significant protective effect (P=0.015).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=180)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does length of stay and administration of depot antipsychotics affect time to readmission in acute psychiatric patients?

P
Population
180 patients with acute psychiatric conditions admitted to a South African hospital, followed for 12 months to assess risk factors for readmission.
E
Exposure
Length of stay and administration of depot antipsychotics in hospital
O
Outcome
Time to readmissionhard clinical

In acute psychiatric patients in South Africa, being married or cohabiting was protective against readmission, whereas length of stay and depot antipsychotics did not significantly impact time to readmission.

Limitations

  • Small sample size
  • Record reviews limited diagnostic accuracy
  • Reliance on record reviews limited ability to track patients accurately, potentially leading to denominator loss
  • Strict criteria used for recording substance abuse and violence may have masked the contribution of these factors
  • Several sampling and statistical artefacts may explain some of our findings

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Deinstitutionalisation and shortage of psychiatric beds worldwide has led to extensive research into the risk factors and interventions associated with rapid and recurrent admission to hospital. Little research of this nature has taken place in South Africa, particularly with regard to acute hospital admissions. This study attempted primarily to assess the effect of length of stay and administration of depot antipsychotics in hospital on time to readmission. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort of 180 admissions was followed up for 12 months, after an index discharge, by means of multiple hospital and community-based record reviews. Each readmission was analysed as an event using a survival analysis model. SETTING: Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Gauteng. SUBJECTS: A random sample of patients admitted during a 6-month period in 1996. OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to readmission. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-four admissions were analysed. The only factor that provided a significant protective effect was being married or cohabiting (P = 0.015). Clinic attendance showed a slight protective effect early on but conferred a significantly higher risk of readmission on those who had been out of hospital for a long period (P = 0.001). Only 21% of discharged patients ever attended a clinic. The overall risk of readmission was significantly higher in the first 90 days post discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of impact of length of hospital stay and use of depot neuroleptics on time to readmission may indicate that patients are being kept for appropriate duration and that the most ill patients are receiving depot medication. Several sampling and statistical artefacts may explain some of our findings. These results confirm the worldwide difficulty in finding consistent and accurate predictors of readmission. Low rates of successful referral to community aftercare need to be addressed before their effectiveness can be reasonably assessed. The inherent instability of the post-discharge period is a potential area for further investigation and intensive management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Behr et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Acute psychiatric illness (n=180). Length of hospital stay and depot antipsychotics vs. Shorter length of stay and no depot antipsychotics was evaluated on Time to readmission. Neither length of hospital stay nor the use of depot neuroleptics significantly impacted the time to psychiatric readmission, whereas being married or cohabiting provided a significant protective effect (P=0.015).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f4080d09bc027e4833afdhttps://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v8i3.930
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper