PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 18, 2026Frontiers in Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Cancer survival in Lower Silesia: insights from a national oncology network pilot in Poland

View Full Paper
MWMagdalena WładysiukPZPaweł ZawadzkiPPPaweł Prędkiewicz

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Introduction: This study provides population-based data on biological subtypes of breast cancer (BC) and associated survival outcomes among Polish women diagnosed between 2019 and 2023 in the Lower Silesia region during the national pilot phase of the National Oncology Network (NON). Methods: Data on BC cases were obtained from the DCOPIH databases as the leader of the pilot program in Poland in between 2019 and 2023 also in the Lower Silesia region. The main outcome was overall cancer survival and cases were linked to existing mortality databases. All patient consent and scope of data analysis was provided based on the MoH Regulation. Analyses included stage at diagnosis, biological subtypes, and five-year survival, stratified by age, subtype, and stage. Results: A total of 4490 women with BC were included. The luminal B subtype was the most prevalent, generally increasing with age and peaking at 46% in the 80+ age group. Across all stages, five-year survival was highest for luminal A (Kaplan Meier estimation of 90.3%. 95% CI: 88.1%-92.5%) and lowest for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (Kaplan Meier estimation of 68.5%, 95% CI: 63.4%-74.0%). For stages I disease, five-year survival was 92.8% for all subtypes aggregated (95% CI: 91.1%-94.5%). Survival declined with advancing stage, particularly for TNBC cases, in population with TNBC diagnosed at stage IV no patient surviving above 48 months was observed. Conclusions: Distinct clinical trajectories of BC subtypes have significant implications for prognosis and healthcare resource allocation. The observation of ≥92% five-year survival for stage I disease across subtypes underscores the critical importance of early detection, particularly in biologically aggressive subtypes such as TNBC breast cancer.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Władysiuk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f4b73fe2692e41a2aada6https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1739198
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Landscape of Breast Cancer Molecular and Histologic Subtypes in Canada2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer2009 · 2,244 citations
  3. 3Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries2018 · 6,300 citations
  4. 4Impact of a programme of mass mammography screening for breast cancer on socio-economic variation in survival: a population-based study2007 · 50 citations
  5. 5Cancer incidence and mortality in Poland in 20232024 · 33 citations