PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 19, 2024Remote Sensing17 citationsOpen Access

Gully Erosion Susceptibility Prediction Using High-Resolution Data: Evaluation, Comparison, and Improvement of Multiple Machine Learning Models

HLHeyang LiJJJizhong JinFDFeiyang Dong

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Gully erosion is one of the significant environmental issues facing the black soil regions in Northeast China, and its formation is closely related to various environmental factors. This study employs multiple machine learning models to assess gully erosion susceptibility in this region. The primary objective is to evaluate and optimize the top-performing model under high-resolution UAV data conditions, utilize the optimized best model to identify key factors influencing the occurrence of gully erosion from 11 variables, and generate a local gully erosion susceptibility map. Using 0.2 m resolution DEM and DOM data obtained from high-resolution UAVs, 2,554,138 pixels from 64 gully and 64 non-gully plots were analyzed and compiled into the research dataset. Twelve models, including Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Classification and Regression Trees, Random Forest, Boosted Regression Trees, Adaptive Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting, an Artificial Neural Network, a Convolutional Neural Network, as well as optimized XGBOOST, a CNN with a Multi-Head Attention mechanism, and an ANN with a Multi-Head Attention Mechanism, were utilized to evaluate gully erosion susceptibility in the Dahewan area. The performance of each model was evaluated using ROC curves, and the model fitting performance and robustness were validated through Accuracy and Cohen’s Kappa statistics, as well as RMSE and MAE indicators. The optimized XGBOOST model achieved the highest performance with an AUC-ROC of 0.9909, and through SHAP analysis, we identified roughness as the most significant factor affecting local gully erosion, with a relative importance of 0.277195. Additionally, the Gully Erosion Susceptibility Map generated by the optimized XGBOOST model illustrated the distribution of local gully erosion risks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f4c2715b3aae2e02aaad6https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244742
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding1994 · 1,753 citations
  2. 2The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms1997 · 7,332 citations
  3. 3Topographic Wetness Index and Terrain Ruggedness Index in geomorphic characterisation of landslide terrains, on examples from the Sudetes, SW Poland2017 · 151 citations
  4. 4Optuna2019 · 8,183 citations
  5. 5Roughness in the Earth Sciences2014 · 254 citations