PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 27, 2025Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres1 citations

Quantifying Fossil Fuel CO 2 Enhancements Along an Urban‐Rural Gradient With Radiocarbon Analysis of Turfgrasses

View Full Paper
CYCindy C. YañezMDManvendra K. DubeyFHF. M. Hopkins

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Atmospheric measurements are needed to verify progress in reducing fossil fuel carbon dioxide (ffCO 2 ) emissions, especially in cities where most ffCO 2 is emitted. However, measurements of CO 2 enhancements alone cannot identify ffCO 2 signals due to complexities in atmospheric dynamics and large natural CO 2 fluxes. Analysis of the radiocarbon ( 14 C) content of urban annual plants can reveal ffCO 2 patterns and is more cost‐effective than air 14 CO 2 sampling, but its use has been limited because of uncertainty in the temporal integration period and because it has not been quantitatively evaluated against other approaches. Here, we analyze the 14 C content of managed perennial turfgrasses collected along an urban to rural gradient in the Greater Los Angeles area. We compare the turfgrass 14 C to measurements of surface CO 2 and total column CO 2 (XCO 2 ). We find that turfgrass 14 C is highly sensitive to local ffCO 2 emissions at the intra‐city scale and captures pronounced differences between urban to rural sites. Despite their different atmospheric footprints, we observe significant correlations between fossil fuel enhancements (C ff ) derived from turfgrass 14 C and total CO 2 enhancements from atmospheric CO 2 measurements. Furthermore, we combine the turfgrass 14 C and surface CO 2 measurements to quantify the portion of excess CO 2 attributable to biospheric fluxes (C bio ). We find that the turfgrass 14 C is dominated by a fossil fuel signal and shows minimal influence of biogenic CO 2 fluxes. We show that turfgrass 14 C analysis can become a useful tool for quantifying ffCO 2 trends in cities that lack permanent surface CO 2 and XCO 2 measurement infrastructure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yañez et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f87c87eab31d529cf356fhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd043336
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper