PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2015Cardiology Research12 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

AKAkihiro KobayashiNMNaoki MisumidaJFJohn T. Fox

Key Result

Elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (> 22 mm Hg) was significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality (3.7% vs. 0.4%) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=367)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does elevated LVEDP (> 22 mm Hg) predict in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI?

P
Population
367 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent coronary angiography, evaluated for in-hospital outcomes.
E
Exposure
Elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP > 22 mm Hg) measured during index cardiac catheterization
C
Comparator
LVEDP ≤ 22 mm Hg
O
Outcome
In-hospital all-cause mortalityhard clinical

Elevated LVEDP (> 22 mm Hg) is significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality and heart failure in patients with NSTEMI, serving as a useful prognostic marker for risk stratification.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 3.7% vs 0.4%

p-value: p=0.03

Limitations

  • Retrospective design
  • Relatively small number of patients
  • Lack of data on long-term clinical events
  • Low in-hospital mortality did not allow evaluation of independent prognostic value
  • retrospective design
  • relatively small number of patients
  • lack of data on long-term clinical events
  • low in-hospital mortality did not allow evaluation of independent prognostic value

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) has been reported to predict an increased mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, its prognostic value in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of NSTEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography between January 2013 and June 2014. We excluded patients who did not undergo LVEDP measurements. Baseline and angiographic characteristics, in-hospital heart failure as well as in-hospital mortality were recorded. RESULTS: After exclusion, 367 patients were included in the final analysis. The median (interquartile range) LVEDP was 19 mm Hg (14 - 24 mm Hg). By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cutoff value for predicting in-hospital mortality was 22 mm Hg (area under the curve 0.80, sensitivity 80%, and specificity 71%). Of 367 patients, 109 patients (29.7%) had LVEDP > 22 mm Hg. Patients with LVEDP > 22 mm Hg had a greater number of comorbidities. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of multi-vessel disease. Patients with LVEDP > 22 mm Hg had a significantly higher rate of in-hospital heart failure (22.0% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.03) and in-hospital mortality (3.7% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.03) than those with LVEDP ≤ 22 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: Elevated LVEDP was significantly associated with a higher in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kobayashi et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) (n=367). Elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP > 22 mm Hg) vs. LVEDP ≤ 22 mm Hg was evaluated on In-hospital all-cause mortality (p=0.03). Elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (> 22 mm Hg) was significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality (3.7% vs. 0.4%) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f87da8b2921da63cf339fhttps://doi.org/10.14740/cr406w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper