PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2010Family Practice389 citationsOpen Access

Psychosocial risk factors for chronic low back pain in primary care--a systematic review

View Full Paper
ARAline RamondCBCéline BoutonIRIsabelle Richard

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a major public health problem, often encountered in primary care. Guidelines recommend early identification of psychosocial factors that could prevent recovery from acute LBP. METHODS: To review the evidence on the prognostic value of psychosocial factors on transition from acute to chronic non-specific LBP in the adult general population. Systematic review is the design of the study. A systematic search was undertaken for prospective studies dealing with psychosocial risk factors for poor outcome of LBP in primary care, screening PubMed, PsychInfo and Cochrane Library databases. The methodological quality of studies was assessed independently by two reviewers using standardized criteria before analysing their main results. RESULTS: Twenty-three papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria, covering 18 different cohorts. Sixteen psychosocial factors were analysed in three domains: social and socio-occupational, psychological and cognitive and behavioural. Depression, psychological distress, passive coping strategies and fear-avoidance beliefs were sometimes found to be independently linked with poor outcome, whereas most social and socio-occupational factors were not. The predictive ability of a patient's self-perceived general health at baseline was difficult to interpret because of biomedical confounding factors. The initial patient's or care provider's perceived risk of persistence of LBP was the factor that was most consistently linked with actual outcome. CONCLUSION: Few independent psychosocial risk factors have been demonstrated to exist. Randomized clinical trials aimed at modifying these factors have shown little impact on patient prognosis. Qualitative research might be valuable to explore further the field of LBP and to define new management strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ramond et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fb582fe56f1c98ca07468https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmq072
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Recent advances: Occupational disease1999 · 40 citations
  2. 2Systematic reviews of low back pain prognosis had variable methods and results—guidance for future prognosis reviews2009 · 248 citations
  3. 3A Systematic Review of Psychological Factors as Predictors of Chronicity/Disability in Prospective Cohorts of Low Back Pain2002 · 1,639 citations
  4. 4Psychosocial predictors of failure to return to work in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review2008 · 294 citations
  5. 5Psychosocial Variables in Patients With (Sub)Acute Low Back Pain2007 · 98 citations